Just reading this...
This answer some of the questions I just posted.
> since an isolated <ec> cannot be converted to a <pc>
Good point (I think).
But the <pc> to isolated <sc>/<ec> case needs to be module/extension agnostic otherwise tools not implementing SLR won't do it.
Cheers,
-ys
-----Original Message-----
From: Estreen, Fredrik [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 1:54 PM
To: Yves Savourel;
Subject: RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em
Hi Yves, all,
Yes, the equivStorage, sizeInfo and sizeInfoRef are allowed on the <ec> element, but only if the <ec> also has isolated set to yes.
The rational is that we need a way to represent the size of the <ec> when it is not paired with a <sc>. And since an isolated <ec>
cannot be converted to a <pc> we do not need additional processing requirements when converting a <sc>,<ec> pair into a <pc>.
The isolated requirement is in the module specification text.
Regards,
Fredrik Estreen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:]
> On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
> Sent: den 8 december 2013 21:24
> To:
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em
>
> To be more specific on the SLR attributes. Currently the specifications say:
>
> On <pc> and <sc>:
>
> - storageRestriction
> - sizeRestriction
> - equivStorage
> - sizeInfo
> - sizeInfoRef
>
> On <ec>:
>
> - equivStorage
> - sizeInfo
> - sizeInfoRef
>
> On <mrk> and <sm>:
>
> - storageRestriction
> - sizeRestriction
>
> On <em>:
>
> None
>
> Looking more closely at the definition now, I think it makes sense.
> But, Fredrik, it would be good if you could confirm that it is the expected list.
> Thanks.
>
> -ys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schnabel, Bryan S [mailto:]
> Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2013 10:07 AM
> To: Yves Savourel;
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em
>
> I think we should take @fs and @subFs off of <ec>. Cannot comment on
> SLR yet.
>
> I am working on some SLR use case and I must say I'm getting pretty
> excited about the module in general (sorry for this general statement
> of support for SLR which does not have any bearing on this thread).
> ________________________________________
> From: [] on
> behalf of Yves Savourel []
> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2013 12:54 PM
> To:
> Subject: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em
>
> Hi Bryan, Fredrik, all
>
> While working on the validation I've noticed that we have the
> attributes for the FS and the SLR modules allowed in <sc> and <ec>,
> but only in <sm> not in <em>.
>
> Is that normal?
>
> Cheers,
> -yves
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
