Hi Bryan, all
I response to Bryan's comments I have edited the Inline Section on subflows as follows:
[New text]
Constraints
An inline code containing or delimiting one or more sub-flows must have an attribute subFlows that holds a list of the identifiers of the <unit> elements where the sub-flows are stored.
Sub-Flows must be in the same <file> element as the <unit> element from which they are referenced.
Processing Requirements
Extractors should store each sub-flow in its own <unit> element.
Extractors may order the <unit> elements of the sub-flows and the <unit> element, from where the subflows are referenced, as they see fit.
Other Writers must preserve the order of <unit> elements as initially set by the Extractor.
[Old text]
Processing Requirements
The extraction tool SHOULD store each sub-flow in its own <unit> element.
An inline code containing or delimiting one or more sub-flows MUST have an attribute subFlows that holds a list of the identifiers of the <unit> elements where the sub-flows are stored.
The extraction tool MAY order the <unit> elements of the sub-flows and the <unit> element of their parent in any order it sees fit. User agents coming later in the process MUST keep the <unit>elements in their initial order.
Please note that this is not yet printed.
Please let me know if the edits are OK with you.
Rgds
dF
Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Dr. David Filip <> wrote:
Thanks, Bryan, I will add a Constraint to subflows stating that subflows MUST not span file elements, than the subflow ids will be automatically unique by the current set of uniqueness constraints
Best regards
dF
Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Schnabel, Bryan S <> wrote:
Hi David,
> Do you think that we should explicitly say
> that subflows are not allowed across file elements?
Not a deal breaker, but yes, I think an explicit statement would be appropriate.
________________________________
From: Dr. David Filip []
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 8:54 AM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S; ;
Subject: csprd02 comment #113
Bryan, I own this comment/issue.
In my opinion this issue is addressed by requiring units to be unique within a file.
Do you think that we should explicitly say that subflows are not allowed across file elements?
Thanks
dF
Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto: <mailto:>
--
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe:
Unsubscribe:
List help:
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xliff
Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/
