Just noting that you did the edit in one of the recent commits
Thanks for it
dF
David Filip, Ph.D.
=====================
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
mailto:
www.davidf.org, http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidfatdavidf
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:10 AM, David Filip <> wrote:
Thanks Yves, I agree that it should be removed from the normative description, although the description does not contain a normative keyword.
I will remove the word external from the description and it will be visible in the next printout.
Rgds
dF
David Filip, Ph.D.
=====================
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
mailto:
www.davidf.org, http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidfatdavidf
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:
Hi David, all,
> Yves, this is just a note and therefore informative
> and not normative.
> We do not forbid internal references other than modules,
> we just discourage them
That note echoes the modified description in the definition of ref (section 4.3.1.27, which is normative):
[[
When used in a term annotation, the URI value is referring to an external resource providing information about the term.
]]
The word "external" should be remove.
Cheers,
-ys
