Follow up Call for dissent re csprd03 209, was: Re: [xliff] Discussion re csprd03 209

As the discussion seems to have been concluded, I am formally calling for dissent.
If we do not hear dissent by Monday EOD PDT the discussed solution both in schema and spec will be approved.

Thanks

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: 

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:

> Just trying to make the type explicit both in documentation and schema, same

> as elsewhere, we always mention NMTOKEN in the value descriptions if the type is NMTOKEN

I guess if we always state the type that's fine.

-ys