Re: [xliff] Call For Dissent re csprd03 re 206

Yves, I think my last proposed formulation is picky/precise just enough
I know the annotation can override itself. But this is informative content putting the annotation mechanism into context with the inheritance from structural level, so I wouldn't actually go into the details of self-overriding.

BTW, we could still use the example of the translatability algorithm behavior in the translate attribute section.

Nevertheless, I assume that you haven't actually expressed dissent with the proposed solution, is that OK?

Thanks and cheers

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: 

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:

If you want to get picky, the annotation actually overrides the value of the translate attribute of the closest ancestor element that can have translate: it can be unit (in most cases) but it can be another <mrk> too.

 

-ys

 

From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:] 

Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 5:08 AM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [xliff] Call For Dissent re csprd03 re 206

 

Thanks, Yves, I was about to implement it but came with a better, more precise formulation

NEW:

Note

This annotation overrides the translate attribute set or inherited at the <unit> level.

 

 

The rationale is that the default inline value is always inherited from unit, no matter if it was set or inherited at the unit level.

So I'd move the deadline for the CFD to next Monday

I am going going to implement today anyway as it is indeed minor

 

Cheers

dF

 

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: 

 

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:

The solution looks OK to me.

Thanks,

-yves

 

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip

Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:53 AM
To: 
Subject: [xliff] Call For Dissent re csprd03 re 206

 

Yves, all,

 

This is to propose a solution for the comment 206 by Yves.

 

I suggest that the Note is changed as follows:

 

[

Old:

Note:

This annotation overrides the translate attribute set at the <segment> level.

 

 

NEW:

Note

This annotation overrides the translate attribute set at or inherited from the <unit> level.

]

 

I will consider this solution approved unless I hear otherwise by the end of this week.

 

I plan to tentatively implement this solution into the spec during tomorrow 

 

Thanks

dF

 

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: