RE: [xliff] Call for Dissent re csprd03 224

Looks good.

Thanks,

-yves

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:39 AM
To: 
Subject: [xliff] Call for Dissent re csprd03 224

 

Hi all,

 

I have replaced in the spec the 5 occurrences of untranslatable with non-translatable as suggested by Yves.

Our usage of untranslatable was in conflict with the natural language meaning of untranslatable which is not being possible to be rendered in another natural language. What we mean is something that is not part (or not intended as part) of the translatable natural language and hence non-translatable. A technical term that is being used in this sense by CAT tool makers etc.

This change will be printed and committed to SVN during today GMT

I will consider this change approved by TC unless I hear dissent by Monday, March 17, end of day PDT.

 

Cheers

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: