RE: [xliff] Call for Dissent re csprd03 225

Looks ok to me.

Thanks.

-yves

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 12:05 PM
To: 
Subject: [xliff] Call for Dissent re csprd03 225

 

Hi all,

 

the skeleton PR was indeed somehow broken.

 

OLD

Modifiers and Enrichers processing an XLIFF Document that contains a <skeleton> element must not change those elements. 

 

Yves suggested

Modifiers and Enrichers processing an XLIFF Document that contains a <skeleton> element MUST NOT change that element and its content.

Since the <skeleton> element can be empty and in that case reference an external skeleton via its href attribute and an elements attribute is strictly speaking not its content I suggest the following text for the PR:

 

NEW

Modifiers and Enrichers processing an XLIFF Document that contains a <skeleton> element MUST NOT change that element, its attributes, or its content.

 

This will be printed and submitted to SVN later today GMT.

I will consider the above approved by the TC unless I hear dissent by Monday, March 17, end of day PDT.

 

Cheers

dF

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: