Hi Bryan,
> Was the conversation around creating an entirely parallel
> representation to cover all of XLIFF, JLIFF, for example?
> Or when you say XLIFF data, do you just mean the translation
> bits, like a JSON representation of group, unit, segment,
> source, target?
We were talking about representing XLIFF data into JSON format.
That could be a full document or something as small as the content of a segment or ignorable.
This is related to the discussion about the XLIFF object model: JSON is just another way to serialize the data.
Cheers,
-yves
