Hi Felix, all,
> Looking at Yves? mockup, there seem to be many parts
> that would not be understood by a generic ITS processors, like:
>
> ? ? The id attribute is REQUIRED.? (for terminology)
>
I don't think a generic ITS processor would need to know things like that to work. If it applies the transformation to deal with
<sm>/<em> and then applies the rules file, it should have all the info it needs.
>> ?If the annotation has an itsm:termConfidence attribute, it must
>> be within the scope of an itsm:annotatorsRef with the terminology
>> annotator set.? .
> Scope here seems to be the unit, not the whole XML file (which it
> would be for a generic ITS processor).
I'm not sure I understand the issue.
The scope here is the scope of the itsm:annotatorsRef. So that attribute could be set on the element where itsm:termConfidence is on
any ancestor where it is allowed. No?
Cheers,
-yves
