RE: [xliff] The Metadata module

> And to be sure, this means that for 2.0, #1 and #2 are the 
> point of record.
> #3 and #4 would then be 2.1 features, correct?

Yes, #3 and #4 would be for 2.1.


> Additionally, do we want to remedy <res:resourceData> not being 
> allowed on <group> as a module? Or will that forever be off-limits
> because it necessitates a change to core?

My understanding is that, yes, it would be a core change, and therefore a 3.x change.

-ys