XLIFF 2.1, late csprd01 comment

Hi all,

when working on other changes in the XLIFF 2.1 spec, I discovered a grave editorial error.

I am reporting this for the record to create an issue, so that the fix can be tracked. albeit formally after the 1st public review deadline.

In the section Normative references, the RFC Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels is mislabeled, as RFC 7303.

It is referenced from wrong locations in the spec, but it correctly points to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt

On the other hand the RFC XML Media Types is mislabeled as RFC 2119.

It is referenced from the wrong locations in the spec and it also incorrectly points to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt instead of RFC 7303.

The suggested course of action us of course to untangle the copy-paste errors between those two important Normative Reference entries.

I hope all will be happy with this proposed fix.

Cheers dF

Dr. David Filip
===========

OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair

OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer

Spokes Research Fellow

ADAPT Centre

KDEG, Trinity College Dublin

Mobile: +420-777-218-122