Lucía, all,
finally finding some time to review this
Links in Q1
should be changed to cs01 links
E.g.
Date TBD by now
http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html
The latest link should be
http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html
3. Are you an OASIS member?
should be
3. Are you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?
Q4
second line should be
I am an Individual member or an associated member
Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually
11. Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication)
should be
11. Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)
Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension
@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?
More comments will follow tomorrow
Cheers
dF
Dr. David Filip
===========
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
Spokes Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
Mobile: +420-777-218-122
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <> wrote:
Dear all,
Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.
Best,
Lucia
De : [mailto:]
De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31
À :
Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft
Dear all,
Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec.
On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated.
For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the
questionnaire) please let me know.
Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.
Best,
Lucía
