Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
Dear David, all, Thank you very much for your feedback. >>on the intro page, the link to test suite should be revision independent, it currently links to an old revision The URL has been modified. >>q15, we still need some examples of XLIFF 2 extensions, sdlxliff is for XLIFF 1.2 In the meantime (or in the case we will not get examples), the note has been modified as follows: Does your tool produce its own custom XLIFF extensions? (such as, for example, "sdlxliff" for the version XLIFF 1.2) >>q69 may some more explanation that partial support is through core term annotation, full through the module A note has been added to clarify this question. Best, Lucía De : David Filip [mailto:] Envoyé : vendredi, 7 avril 2017 12:25 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <> Cc : Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update Hi Lucía, all, on the intro page, the link to test suite should be revision independent, it currently links to an old revision q15, we still need some examples of XLIFF 2 extensions, sdlxliff is for XLIFF 1.2 q69 may some more explanation that partial support is through core term annotation, full through the module Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <> wrote: Dear all, As discussed in the last TC meeting, I have just applied the changes related to the new draft in the survey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further feedback on it. Thanks and have a nice weekend, Lucía De : [mailto:] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : lundi, 27 février 2017 18:24 À : David Filip <> Cc : Objet : RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update Dear David, Thank you for your message. I have just changed the settings of the survey . The survey can be taken more than once from the same device. Best, Lucía De : David Filip [mailto:] Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 10:08 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <> Cc : Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update Hi Lucía, it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows? Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <> wrote: Dear David, all, Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21 In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected. The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?) One of David’s suggestions is still not modified: >>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension >>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples? Please let me know if you have any more feedback. Best, Lucía De : [mailto:] De la part de David Filip Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02 À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <>; Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update Hi all, continued feedback to the questionnaire Q25. Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated] Q58. shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es) But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here. The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is its:annotatorsRef So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute Q60 same as Q58 Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters Q62 same as Q58 and Q60 Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains Q64 shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es) Just two checkboxes: its:localeFilterList its:localeFilterType Q66 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core Q68 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core Q69 Analyis -> Analysis Q70 Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core Q71-Q73 should be removed Maybe replace with Q71 Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment Annotation Q74 Does your tool support the Terminology data category? should be Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category? Q75 There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes + there also needs to be a checkox for type="its:term-no" [not just for the core type unspecified] Q77 Just one checkbox for itsm:lang Q79 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes Q81 Checkboxes just for the its: attributes This is now my complete feedback When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to launch Cheers dF Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip <> wrote: Lucía, all, finally finding some time to review this Links in Q1 should be changed to cs01 links E.g. Date TBD by now http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html The latest link should be http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html 3. Are you an OASIS member? should be 3. Are you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization? Q4 second line should be I am an Individual member or an associated member Chet clarified that asscociated members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually 11. Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication) should be 11. Contact Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication) Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension @Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples? More comments will follow tomorrow Cheers dF Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <> wrote: Dear all, Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21 Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire. Best, Lucia De : [mailto:] De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2016 16:31 À : Objet : [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft Dear all, Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21 I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec. On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated. For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know. Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself. Best, Lucía
Next in thread →
Next in month →