Hi Yves,
would you please advise an improved wording for the warning?
Warning
This annotation can be syntactically in scope of a relevant its:annotatorsRef attribute, while it still fails to resolve with the intended value. This can happen if more then one terminology providers were used.
It seems fine to me ;-)
Cheers and thanks
dF
Dr. David Filip
===========
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
Spokes Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
Mobile: +420-777-218-122
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:09 PM, David Filip <> wrote:
Hi Yves,
I created a csprd03 issue from this
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-53
The associated thread is
http://markmail.org/thread/m7izjxihm74dfyge
Cheers
dF
Dr. David Filip
===========
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
Spokes Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
Mobile: +420-777-218-122
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:
Hi all,
There is at least one remaining comment in the draft: In section “5.9.7.2.3 ITS Terminology Annotation” we have a warning with an inline comment: “COMMENT: HARD TO UNDERSTAND THE INTENTION OF THE WARNING, NEEDS REWRITING OR SHOULD BE DROPPED.”
I guess this need to be resolved before csprd04.
Cheers,
-yves
Yves Savourel
Localization Solutions Architect | ENLASO®
4888 Pearl East Circle | Suite 300E | Boulder | Colorado 80301
t: 303.945.3759 | f: 303.516.1701
An ISO 9001:2015 certified company
Confidentiality Notice
The information in this transmittal may be privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal, in any form, is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient. If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.
