Informal statement (Re: [xliff] Proposing a ballot to resolve https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-57)

Hi David, all,

my working hours do not allow participating in the XLIFF TC calls, hence I lost my voting rights. This does not mean that I do not participate in the TC work, see e.g. the changes to the ITS rules just started. So I am not sure if call participation is a good way to measure level of involvement, but I will not argue on formalities.

So this is my informal statement that I agree with Yves arguments. These warning do not add any benefit to implementers and should be removed.

Cheers,

Felix

2017-06-26 11:05 GMT+02:00 David Filip <>:

Hi all,

this is to propose a ballot to resolve

https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-57

*Looking for a second.*

This will be a simple majority ballot, the option with most votes wins, abstentions don't count.

Title:

Keep annotatorsRef Warnings as per Issue XLIFF-57

Question:

Keep annotatorsRef Warnings as per Issue XLIFF-57?

Description:

Voting "Yes" means you vote for keeping those Warnings as is.

Voting "No" means you want those Warnings removed as proposed in

https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-57

Abstentions are possible but don't count.

Cheers and thanks

dF

Dr. David Filip
===========

OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair

OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer

Spokes Research Fellow

ADAPT Centre

KDEG, Trinity College Dublin

Mobile: +420-777-218-122