← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
ID-ness in XML
Here are some questions that bother me about the use of an attribute instead of a PI. 1) Why should an issue that most people consider to be orthogonal to validation interrupt validation as an instance moves between well-formedness and validity? 2) Given that the root element might be any element in the DTD, in order to cover themselves, the thorough DTD creator would have to declare it for every element. True? Does this seem counter-intuitive? Declaring the attribute locally x number of times seems inelegant, born out of a lack of a global mechanism. 3) As DTDs are by far the most frequently used tool for the development of an XML dataset, is it fair to assume that most XML documents are valid at at least one point in their lives? Accepting that, does it follow that the addition of the xml:id attribute has the potential to impact on most XML documents in existence? (Every one that conforms to a DTD.) -- Regards, Marcus Carr email: ___________________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au ___________________________________________________________________ "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread