Kal Ahmed wrote:
>
> I would just be interested to hear if RDDL developers considered and
> discarded the possibility of creating a set of Published Subject
Indicators
> for a topic map-based solution (with the associated semantics) and if so,
> why ? One potential advantage in this approach is that later changes would
> not require additional syntax - just new PSIs and more semantics.
>
I am not sure what a "Published Subject Indicator" is, so at least I did not
consider that solution. What would that look like?
Jonathan
