On Tuesday 12 February 2002 01:06 pm, Mark Baker wrote:
> Thought why he wouldn't want it to identify himself, rather than an
> HTML page is a different question. Certainly just *because* the GET
> returns an HTML when you ask it for that (all browsers ask for
> text/html), doesn't mean that the URI identifies the HTML. HTML is
> one *representation* of the resource, not necessarily the resource
> itself.
Not everyone subscribes to this view. Most people would be very
surprised if /mark-baker.jpg sent them an mp3 of a cricket match.
