Patrick Stickler wrote:
> But is not the representation of a resource a resource? How
> do we then refer to both "the Eiffel Tower" and a "description
> of the Eiffel Tower" if they have the same URI.
Exactly my point throughout this thread.
> If a URI can name everything, then every thing should have
> its own URI, if it is thus named.
Yes.
--
John Cowan <> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
