Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names

xml-dev · February 2002 · 15 messages · back to month

#	Subject	From	Date
00803	Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Jonathan Borden	2002-02-16 20:45
00785	Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Simon St.Laurent	2002-02-16 22:10
00791	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Jonathan Borden	2002-02-17 01:46
00796	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Simon St.Laurent	2002-02-17 02:40
00739	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Joe English	2002-02-17 03:49
00764	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Joe English	2002-02-17 04:37
00711	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	John Cowan	2002-02-17 04:47
00725	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Joe English	2002-02-17 04:58
00783	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Simon St.Laurent	2002-02-17 04:58
00709	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Elliotte Rusty Harold	2002-02-17 04:59
00726	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Simon St.Laurent	2002-02-17 06:20
00767	RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Joshua Allen	2002-02-17 06:31
00780	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Gary Stephenson	2002-02-17 06:34
00769	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Mike Champion	2002-02-17 14:57
00777	Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names	Elliotte Rusty Harold	2002-02-17 15:02