Unnecessary decoration (was Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question)

On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 11:09, Paul Prescod wrote:
> The usual trick for statically typed languages is to compile the schema
> into code that implements the conversions for you. Once again its merely
> a convenience.

Once you've done that, do you still have any use for the PSVI as extra
annotations to individual documents?

There seems to be a big gap between design-time usefulness of the PSVI
and its run-time usefulness.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com