← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Mike Champion' <>,
Date
2002-03-05T20:37:12Z
ID
<2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE997@HQ5>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
Ummm... what's the difference in in-bandness in 
the instance vs just requiring a schema of some kind to 
travel with the document, other than that puts one back 
in SGMLLand pretty solidly?

We do seem to work a lot to preserve well-formed options.

I liked John's cut on AFs.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Champion [mailto:]

OK, I think I see the advantage of an "out of band" schema in this scenario.
But that brings us back to the PSVI "chicken and egg" problem that got me
started.  Sigh.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread