John Cowan wrote:
> If you feed this to an RDF processor, and assuming some default
> namespace is in effect (say, the same that has the x: prefix),
> then it will spew these triples:
>
> _:a rdf:type x:movie
> _:a x:name "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back"
> _:a x:director "Kevin Smith"
>
> So, without meaning to, you have actually written a perfectly
> correct RDF document. It asserts that the "movie" element
> represents a resource of type x:movie, with an x:name of "Jay and
> Silent Bob Strike Back" and an x:director of "Kevin Smith".
What value does use of RDF add in this case?
Matt
