Re: [xml-dev] What are Web Services for? (Was RE: [xml-dev] lots of WS

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> Paul Prescod scripsit:
> 
> > Possibly, but bear in mind that there is a distinction between RDF
> > syntax and model. The RDF people probably have to figure out how to
> > allow ANY arbitrary XML syntax to be mapped into the RDF model. Then it
> > won't be a choice between XML features and RDF features.
> 
> Almost true already.  Show me any random XML without mixed content
> in it, and I can interpret it as RDF for you.  It may not make much
> *sense* as RDF, but it will be legal, except for corner cases.

Well I need it to make *sense* as RDF or else what's the point? ;) Plus
I need to be able to handle mixed content in at least some parts of the
document without the RDF processor croaking. It should keep those as
literal XML fragments.

 Paul Prescod