"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
>
> Did you get anyone defending SOAP on its technical merits?
Technical merits?
Not really. There were quite a few who technically bashed it in response
to Joel's article though:
* http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftware/default.asp
> You and Mark Baker seem to present more technical defense than any of
> the "advocates", which has me thoroughly confused.
>
> (Don Box did bring up a common framing format[1], but I'm having a hard
> time seeing the format mitigating the overall approach.)
Actually, if I get time I will write an article on how XML is a lousy
envelope format (whatever its other virtues!).
Paul Precod
