Mark Baker wrote,
> Bill de hÓra wrote:
> > By your definition, can you name something that isnt on the web?
>
> No, because by naming something, you identify it. And all things
> that are identifiable can be on the Web.
<sigh/>
We've been here before ...
It might be true that _anything_ that could be identified with a URI
and hence be on the web, but it doesn't follow from that that
_everything_ could be identified with a URI and hence be on the web
(The Fallacy of Composition, qv.).
Why not? Because there is at most a countable infinity or URIs
(they're finite string of characters drawn from a finite alphabet),
but no obvious bound on the number of "things", eg. there are far
too many real numbers, or shades of blue for each to have a distinct
URI.
There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in
RFC 2396.
Cheers,
Miles