RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial)

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
"''" <>
Date
2002-05-23T21:09:20Z
ID
<2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B4C7@HQ5>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial)
And of course, sellers of open source want everyone to believe 
they don't make unpublished extensions to open 
source software thus giving themselves closed source 
advantages.  Spy vs Spy.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:]

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:22:03PM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> At the rate of attacks, at some point, Outlook 
> will be the most secure and virus resistant client 
> available. 

  ROTFL,

Sorry, security is design based, the process of tranforming a 
product not designed with security in mind by filling up the gaps
one by one as they get discovered on the customer deployments is
simply a pure (and sad) joke.

  Of course producers of closed source software would like people
to believe in this crap, but not here please !!!