RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial)

From
Michael Kay <>
To
'Dare Obasanjo' <>, 'Joe English' <>,
Date
2002-05-24T08:36:20Z
ID
<001201c202fe$144e26d0$6501a8c0@pcukmka>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial)
> However you may simply be claiming that the ability for users 
> to receive or run attachments is a feature that should not be 
> enabled by MUAs in today's hostile Internet. It is sad, but 
> many seem to believe that such thinking is the answer. :( 

We really are off-topic here, but surely the only proper solution is
that untrusted code should be run in a sandbox. Yes, this needs a decent
operating system and possibly even hardware support for addressing
protection. The basic security principles have been known for 30 years.
Sooner or later people are going to switch to a properly secure
computing platform, the current situation with virus-checking and spam
is getting more and more farcical.

Michael Kay