← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)

From
Manos Batsis <>
To
Date
2002-06-07T13:48:13Z
ID
<>
Thread
XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
I was wondering how this list feels about the current draft of XSLT2.0
and it's use of XML Schemas. IMHO, the choice of outsourcing this "type
importing" functionality in a way to be transparent to XSLT, could
result in the ability to use types from various schema languages but
XSLT 2.0 from what I understand does take XML Schema for granted. Anyone
want to make it clearer for me?
Regards,

Manos


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Champion [mailto:] 
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:40 PM
> To: 
> Subject: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "The reality is, XML Schema is the foundation for the rest of 
> XML," said Box. Technologies such as XML Query take XML 
> Schema "for granted, as a given," he said.
> 
> SOAP messages need to function with XML Schema, he said. "XML 
> Schema is an inevitability. Resistance is futile. There 
> is no point in not embracing this thing and I strongly 
> encourage those of you who work in Web services technologies 
> [to] make sure your story is straight" with respect to XML 
> Schema, Box said.
> 
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/06/06/020606hnbox.xml?s=rss&t=news&slot=3







-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread