-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: W. E. Perry [mailto:]
>
Walter,
> I apologize if this seems like nitpicking or if my point
> appears nearly invisible. It is not.
I intuit you do have a point. It's hard to follow. I suspect
there's a good amount of terminology that you're using. Perhaps you
could write it up in a more accessible form, for those of who are
not familiar with philology, but are interested in the relationship
between XML data and processing over that data?
Bill de hÓra
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4
iQA/AwUBPQddsOaWiFwg2CH4EQI7PQCgsPlAYpgkU7pRQV6XT+oDhRLkUREAnAkl
3xRvvXdMjEjiORItmlTumeGN
=LiaL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
