Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

From
John Cowan <>
To
Date
2002-06-13T13:11:39Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Thomas B. Passin scripsit:

> Hmm, that would mean that we declare a namespace twice, once in the DTD and
> once in the XML document.  The redundancy bothers me.  What would make sense
> is associating a prefix with a namespace for use in the DTD, but making sure
> that it would not have to be the same prefix as the document uses (as long
> as the actual namespace uri is the same):

Exactly what I meant.

-- 
John Cowan <>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_