Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?

From
John Cowan <>
To
Date
2002-06-14T10:22:25Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> Why not just assign whole element sets to a namespace, in the external DSDL framework,
> and leave the syntax of DTDs exactly as it is?

I don't understand this.  How do you specify that the content model
of a foo:one element is a foo:two element followed by an html:p element?

> But this is discussing techniques before requirements.

A habit of mine, I fear.

> What are the requirements for DTDs in DSDL?

The title of Part 9 is all we have to go on, and it talks about
namespace-aware and datatype-aware DTDs.

-- 
John Cowan <>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_