Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
Tim Bray <>
Date
2002-07-31T22:10:55Z
ID
<r01050300-1015-627F11D4A4D211D693BB0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)
Tim Bray writes:
> And yes, it is obvious that an attribute can draw the bulk of its 
> semantic import from the namespace it's in, rather than the context of 
> the containing element.  Consider
> 
> <anyOldElementAtAllIDontCareWhich xml:lang="fr">Bonjour!  ...

Yes, and you've completely missed my point yet again.  I'm not arguing
that prefixed attributes should be in the namespace of the element
containing them.  I'm arguing that _unprefixed_ attributes should be
treated as if they had the same namespace as the element containing
them.

> There's a technical term for Simon's argument in this case: "wrong".

There's a technical term for the Namespaces in XML Recommendation, but
I'm afraid it's unprintable.  I stand by my claim.

I'd like to propose that it's past time to fix these issues instead of
leaving them to fester. 

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com