At 02:34 PM 7/8/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>Or you could try taking a look at SiXDML
> http://www.xmldb.org/sixdml/
Nifty!
I'm not entirely sure how you're defining collections and subcollections,
but this is definitely intriguing despite its use of (though no dependency
on) W3C XML Schema. Namespaces look a bit tricky, but I'm glad to see
someone's already at work on something that looks like this.
The day just got brighter.
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
