RE: [xml-dev] Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at

> From: bryan [mailto:] 

> I was just wondering since I don't do as much with Mozilla as 
> I should,
> but if I remember correctly it's xlink implementation was all simple
> xlinks and didn't give any benefits beyond the basic html a link. Is
> that incorrect? 

Sorry, yup.


> If so can someone give me a succinct 
> description of the
> xlink benefits Mozilla has above simple linking?


Try this test page by Bob DuCharme.

http://www.snee.com/xml/xlink/sxlinkdemo.xml

Manos