> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:46 AM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: David Carlisle; ;
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation,
> and Schema V ersioning
> As far as the Schema WG is concerned, we've tried _very_ hard
> not to do that, and your representatives on the WG have not
> identified any cases of this happening as far as I know --
> please let the WG know ASAP which errata rendered previously
> valid schemas or instances invalid!
That's interesting given that I've mentioned on this very list about the
non-breaking change that was the gMonth errata[0] which invalidated
previously valid schemata like the one below
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:simpleType name="NotDecember">
<xs:restriction base="xs:gMonth">
<xs:maxInclusive value="--11--" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:schema>
I'd be very surprised if our standards reps have not brought this up
with the W3C XML Schema working group since they are well aware of this
issue.
[0] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments#pfiLexgMonth
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Going the speed of light is bad for your age.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
