> From: Andrew Dubinsky [mailto:]
> A fully resolved link would include the data within the same file
> resource. E.g. a copy of the resource.
>
> <img src="<<binhex data of gif>>" />
Sorry Andrew, that doesn't seem right at all. Even if it did, it won't
be usable.
>
> I understand that copying the gif data within each file is fat and
> 'violates' the spirit of the URI concept.
Yes you can say that again :-)
> However, in our use, we must
> have the data bound directly to a digitally signed file. In the normal
> use of links, the underlying content of the link could be changed
> without modifying the hashed value of the document.
How about bundling the files (html, images and the like) to an
executable?
> Any usages of legal documents pointing to user agreements, or other
> click-through agreements fall within the category. E.g. Which
> agreement
> did you agree to if it was included by reference (and not by direct
> inclusion) if the agreement is no longer available?
Perhaps you need to use SVG instead of HTML.
> In other words, no standard parser would understand it.
Yup.
Manos
