[Lars Marius Garshol]
>
> * Thomas B. Passin
> |
> | You also do not have a hope of getting the WXS schema right without
> | a tool to help, [...]
>
> Just a little note: the XML Schema specification calls the language
> defined in that specification "XML Schema definition language". It
> seems to me that it makes more sense to call the language XSDL.
> (The Charles Goldfarb series of books already do.)
>
I saw it used in a thread and decided to try it out to see how I like it. I
do not really like "WXS", but I think the idea was to get a reference to the
W3C in there, and to remove any suggestion that only this schema language
qualifies as __an__ "XML Schema Language". Still don't like it, though.
Cheers,
Tom P
