RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)

 wrote:

> > XHTML 2.0 seems to be the one bright light amongst the 
> > maze of W3C specs currently in vogue. 

> Really??  Can you expound on why you believe XHTML 2.0 to 
> be a "bright light"?

What Simon said.

	http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200208/msg01173.html


I'll just add that simple functionality and common sense appear -- at
least temporarily -- to have triumphed over byzantine theological
imperatives.  :)


/Jelks