Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d

From
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) <>
To
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <>, ,
Date
2002-08-21T14:09:47Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>Understood.   But mapping may be necessary or acceptance 
>of the limits of striping.  It's a case of half-measures 
>where half-measures are adequate.   It is also a design 
>issue.  If one is designing new vocabularies rather than 
>shoe horning legacy vocabularies, designing with the SW 
>in mind from the beginning would appear to be a good idea.
>

Agreed, so let's do just that since we do have the opportunity and see 
how it goes ;-)

Manos