Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)

> At 12:57 AM -0500 8/22/02, Jeff Rafter wrote:
>
> >For example, I can't reliably mix my own vocabulary into XHTML because I
> >can't validate it or it isn't supported well.
>
> Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
> Sure you can. This is exactly what modular XHTML is designed for. The
> specs give detailed instructions for how to mix your own vocabularies
> into XHTML by setting the appropriate parameter entity references in
> a driver DTD.

Perhaps a more accessible starting point would be W3C's tutorial, "XHTML
Modules and Markup Languages - How to create XHTML Family modules and markup
languages for fun and profit" [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Guide/xhtml-m12n-tutorial/

- Ken Sall                or 
- XML Consultant/Author  http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kensall/
- XML Family of Specifications: A Practical Guide (just published)
- http://WDVL.Internet.com/Authoring/Languages/XML/XMLFamily/