> From: Amelia A Lewis [mailto:]
>
> I realize that there is a wide consensus in the XML/web community that
> optional bits are bad. However, this, it seems to me, is a
> counter-case. There is no such thing as a universal type system.
{1,0} ... nah, it'd never scale.
But seriously if we can support ISO language types in XML, why not SI,
or even just the SI base units? What all this fuss currently with
xml:lang, it's odd we don't have an xml:unit.
regards,
Bill de hÓra
..
Propylon
www.propylon.com