RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
"'Thomas B. Passin'" <>,
Date
2002-08-02T14:10:21Z
ID
<2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B73D@HQ5>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the
So adopt the principle of least surprise:  an unqualified 
attribute gets the namespace of the element.

If that doesn't work, then namespaces really are a 
disaster.  It can't take a mathematician to do this 
work and understand it.  That perverts what markup 
is for and has been about prior to the namespaces rec. 

Simon and Uche are right. 

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:]

 I could have been reasonably happy either way, but what does not work for
me is this mix-and-match situation where some systems do it one way and
others do it another way.