Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

From
Norman Walsh <>
To
Date
2002-08-15T19:33:43Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
/ "Simon St.Laurent" <> was heard to say:
|> (<rant>What happened to the
|> Last Call comments to rename the "Selectors" document[1] to "CSS3
|> Selectors". More paperwork to dig through...Sigh.</rant>)
|
| Probably a good idea, though maybe we should rename XPath to XSLT
| Selectors...

Fair enough. Or XPath Selectors, maybe, since it's used in XPointer as well.

|> Simplicity is loosing everywhere, ain't it?
|
| It already lost in XPath - what's the surprise for CSS?  I'll be happy
| so long as CSS3 stays simpler than XPath 2.0.  Or maybe that's just my
| cynicism speaking!

I sympathize. I really do.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
    | Convictions are more dangerous enemies of
XML Standards Architect | truth than lies.--Nietzsche
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  |