Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
Date
2002-08-16T16:43:22Z
ID
<r01050300-1015-47055DE7B13711D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
> Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> 
> > I miss XArc (http://jfinity.com/xarc/spec-current/index.html)  if we
> > want to talk about clean.
> 
> Er the role/arcrole stuff in XLink is a direct steal from XArc,
there's 
> even a thank-you in the text of the spec.  I think the theft was 
> successful, i.e. they got the good pieces.  

I know (and participated in) the history.  My point here is that
importing XArc into a larger XLink spec doesn't automatically make XLink
clean.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com