Simon St.Laurent [mailto:] wrote:
> You might do well to remember that some of us take snide comments
> about "purity" (or "aesthetics", or "academic", etc.) to be
> themselves insulting.
Fair enough, I meant no insult in my use of "purity". I often make
arguments related to design purity and the benefits of such. I guess I
find comments like "moronization" and "bozoware" a bit more offensive
and immature.
AR's true intentions shine through if you visit his Web page via IE:
"SAY NO TO MICROSOFT!" or the following recent sig: "The day Microsoft
makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making
vacuum cleaners...". So I don't think it's unfair to question his
attacks anytime someone from (or associated with) MS replies to one of
his posts.
--
Aaron Skonnard <http://skonnard.com>, DevelopMentor <http://develop.com>
Essential XML Quick Reference available online in PDF format...
<http://develop.com/books>
