xml-dev

← back

1,463 messages · 253 threads

# Subject From Date
00048 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-01 07:21
00060 RE: [xml-dev] Just Can't Get No REST Bill de hÓra 2002-10-01 08:39
00052 Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Arjun Ray 2002-10-01 08:51
00059 re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Sean McGrath 2002-10-01 09:31
00013 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 09:42
00018 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Jonathan Robie 2002-10-01 10:24
00042 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 10:47
00040 RE: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Mark Seaborne 2002-10-01 10:49
00038 The XPath/XQuery juggernaut (Was: limits of the generic) [email protected] 2002-10-01 12:13
00043 RE: [xml-dev] limits of the generic James Fuller 2002-10-01 12:42
00017 Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping Keith W. Boone 2002-10-01 13:07
00015 RE: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-01 13:33
00010 Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-01 13:53
00019 XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 13:54
00023 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-01 14:04
00008 Re: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? W. E. Perry 2002-10-01 14:09
00036 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-01 14:17
00045 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 14:23
00046 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns bob mcwhirter 2002-10-01 14:25
00035 Re: [xml-dev] XML document/message versioning -- possible model? james anderson 2002-10-01 14:35
00012 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Daniel Veillard 2002-10-01 14:40
00020 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-01 14:45
00014 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 14:52
00049 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-01 14:59
00016 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Robin LaFontaine 2002-10-01 15:06
00053 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-01 15:12
00056 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 15:18
00032 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Joe English 2002-10-01 15:19
00025 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Sam Hunting 2002-10-01 15:23
00028 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-01 15:30
00029 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 15:31
00057 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-01 15:32
00051 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-01 15:34
00061 Ann: Guide to the XML Schema Specifications Kal Ahmed 2002-10-01 15:37
00027 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-01 15:51
00030 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jonathan Robie 2002-10-01 15:54
00058 Re: [xml-dev] Ann: Guide to the XML Schema Specifications Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 15:56
00050 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-01 15:58
00054 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Aaron Skonnard 2002-10-01 15:59
00055 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Robin Berjon 2002-10-01 16:00
00026 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-01 16:06
00033 Re: [xml-dev] Ann: Guide to the XML Schema Specifications m a r l o n . n e l s o n 2002-10-01 16:06
00031 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-01 16:07
00024 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-01 16:11
00034 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns John Cowan 2002-10-01 16:15
00047 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 16:16
00011 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-01 16:17
00021 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-01 16:24
00022 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic John Cowan 2002-10-01 16:32
00009 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Lauren Wood 2002-10-01 16:49
00037 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Tim Bray 2002-10-01 17:00
00044 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Jeni Tennison 2002-10-01 17:07
00039 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-01 17:09
00041 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-01 17:12
00114 Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping Wayne Steele 2002-10-01 17:47
00128 Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping Sam Hunting 2002-10-01 18:10
00085 Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping Wayne Steele 2002-10-01 18:34
00070 "Datatypes" for DTDs Arjun Ray 2002-10-01 19:37
00071 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Arjun Ray 2002-10-01 20:24
00084 Re: [xml-dev] Just Can't Get No REST Paul Prescod 2002-10-01 20:38
00129 RE: [xml-dev] Just Can't Get No REST Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-01 21:02
00112 Re: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Paul Prescod 2002-10-01 22:07
00127 RE: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Joshua Allen 2002-10-01 22:13
00116 Re: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Paul Prescod 2002-10-01 22:18
00101 Re: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Alaric Snell 2002-10-01 22:33
00089 JITTs: A Theory No Longer! Patrick Durusau 2002-10-02 00:08
00158 RE: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Ian Graham 2002-10-02 02:16
00149 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-02 02:27
00287 Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Eric Bohlman 2002-10-02 02:42
00159 Re: [xml-dev] "Datatypes" for DTDs Bob DuCharme 2002-10-02 03:33
00148 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Mike Champion 2002-10-02 04:00
00091 RE: [xml-dev] re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Bob DuCharme 2002-10-02 04:02
00100 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 04:13
00087 ...the future of Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)? m a r l o n . n e l s o n 2002-10-02 04:27
00102 Re: [xml-dev] "Datatypes" for DTDs Arjun Ray 2002-10-02 05:28
00086 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 06:06
00104 Fwd: The XPath/XQuery juggernaut (Was: limits of the generic) [email protected] 2002-10-02 08:10
00160 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns bryan 2002-10-02 08:21
00147 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns bryan 2002-10-02 08:36
00146 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-02 09:35
00161 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-02 09:52
00103 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns John Cowan 2002-10-02 11:11
00088 Re: RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Mike Champion 2002-10-02 11:57
00099 Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) m a r l o n . n e l s o n 2002-10-02 13:06
00090 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Robin Berjon 2002-10-02 13:46
00125 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-02 14:01
00117 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Tim Bray 2002-10-02 14:17
00072 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Tim Bray 2002-10-02 14:21
00083 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Tim Bray 2002-10-02 14:36
00082 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-02 14:52
00073 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Keith W. Boone 2002-10-02 14:53
00115 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Aaron Skonnard 2002-10-02 14:58
00126 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Paul Prescod 2002-10-02 15:11
00113 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Rich Salz 2002-10-02 15:20
00130 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-02 15:27
00155 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Paul Prescod 2002-10-02 15:27
00140 Re: [xml-dev] limits of the generic Jeni Tennison 2002-10-02 15:31
00092 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Norman Walsh 2002-10-02 15:31
00110 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-02 15:33
00109 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Aaron Skonnard 2002-10-02 15:38
00094 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-02 15:41
00138 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Robin Berjon 2002-10-02 15:42
00156 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Mike Champion 2002-10-02 15:46
00143 Major new release of XSV [email protected] 2002-10-02 15:48
00154 well-formed Web Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 15:49
00067 The "Wiindow of Standardization" (was Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Mike Champion 2002-10-02 15:54
00076 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 16:08
00132 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Aaron Skonnard 2002-10-02 16:13
00124 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-02 16:16
00122 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 16:21
00133 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-02 16:21
00075 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 16:33
00069 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 16:42
00077 Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Norman Walsh 2002-10-02 16:45
00064 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Keith W. Boone 2002-10-02 16:45
00081 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 16:50
00062 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 16:56
00120 Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Norman Walsh 2002-10-02 16:59
00135 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Robin Berjon 2002-10-02 17:01
00136 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Robin Berjon 2002-10-02 17:15
00119 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Paul Prescod 2002-10-02 17:26
00066 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Robin Berjon 2002-10-02 17:39
00078 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Michael Kay 2002-10-02 18:46
00068 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 18:49
00074 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Michael Kay 2002-10-02 19:04
00151 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Tim Bray 2002-10-02 19:04
00144 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Michael Kay 2002-10-02 19:06
00108 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Rich Salz 2002-10-02 19:13
00095 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Tim Bray 2002-10-02 19:18
00098 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Karl Waclawek 2002-10-02 19:21
00105 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Tim Bray 2002-10-02 19:22
00152 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 19:23
00142 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Jeni Tennison 2002-10-02 19:31
00157 Re: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Norman Walsh 2002-10-02 19:37
00139 Re: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 19:55
00097 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Aaron Skonnard 2002-10-02 19:57
00106 Re: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Ann Navarro 2002-10-02 19:59
00153 Re: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Joe Gregorio 2002-10-02 20:15
00141 Re: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Norman Walsh 2002-10-02 20:23
00145 RE: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 20:31
00150 Re: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Norman Walsh 2002-10-02 20:33
00107 Type-based design patterns Norman Walsh 2002-10-02 20:42
00096 RE: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 20:49
00111 Re: [xml-dev] "Datatypes" for DTDs Wayne Steele 2002-10-02 21:07
00093 RE: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 21:09
00137 Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content? Wayne Steele 2002-10-02 21:21
00118 RE: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 21:24
00065 RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 21:27
00079 RE: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 21:38
00080 RE: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-02 21:49
00063 RE: [xml-dev] well-formed Web Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-02 22:02
00121 Re: [xml-dev] Are hyperlinks presentation or content? W. E. Perry 2002-10-02 22:27
00134 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns Wayne Steele 2002-10-02 23:14
00123 Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns (off topic) Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre 2002-10-03 01:27
00131 Re: [xml-dev] "Datatypes" for DTDs Arjun Ray 2002-10-03 02:50
00185 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Patrick Durusau 2002-10-07 14:28
00170 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Patrick Durusau 2002-10-07 14:31
00214 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) John Cowan 2002-10-07 14:37
00228 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sam Hunting 2002-10-07 14:44
00171 Re: [xml-dev] XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in Jeni Tennison 2002-10-07 14:58
00184 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Tim Bray 2002-10-07 14:58
00229 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-07 15:04
00212 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sam Hunting 2002-10-07 15:05
00227 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-07 15:07
00216 LMNL Pull John Cowan 2002-10-07 15:10
00201 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) John Cowan 2002-10-07 15:13
00189 white spaces before prolog . can i work aroung it Sinha, Raj (Raj) 2002-10-07 15:16
00249 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) John Cowan 2002-10-07 15:21
00258 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) John Cowan 2002-10-07 15:24
00259 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sam Hunting 2002-10-07 15:33
00248 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Patrick Durusau 2002-10-07 15:49
00191 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-07 16:06
00200 Essentials (was RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web)) Mike Champion 2002-10-07 16:08
00187 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-07 16:31
00202 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) W. E. Perry 2002-10-07 16:33
00186 Re: [xml-dev] Essentials (was RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the John Cowan 2002-10-07 17:06
00204 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-07 17:08
00260 RE: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-07 17:44
00247 RE: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-07 17:54
00246 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) W. E. Perry 2002-10-07 18:05
00261 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-07 18:50
00203 Re: [xml-dev] More namespaces fun! Tim Bray 2002-10-07 19:01
00188 Re: [xml-dev] More namespaces fun! Paul Prescod 2002-10-07 19:24
00199 Re: [xml-dev] More namespaces fun! Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-07 19:42
00190 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-07 20:00
00225 Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Roger L. Costello 2002-10-07 20:04
00217 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-07 20:08
00172 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-07 20:16
00183 RE: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-07 20:26
00182 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-07 20:28
00173 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-07 21:19
00226 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Patrick Durusau 2002-10-07 21:22
00213 RE: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters Joshua Allen 2002-10-07 21:49
00215 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture m batsis 2002-10-07 21:59
00230 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-07 22:05
00255 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Rich Salz 2002-10-07 22:30
00240 Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web m batsis 2002-10-07 23:06
00192 Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web David Carlisle 2002-10-07 23:51
00210 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Ian Graham 2002-10-07 23:53
00209 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Paul Prescod 2002-10-08 00:26
00194 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Rich Salz 2002-10-08 00:42
00238 RE: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters Praj Joshi 2002-10-08 00:55
00256 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-08 05:01
00243 Re: [xml-dev] white spaces before prolog . can i work aroung it Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 05:04
00254 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-08 05:15
00167 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 05:20
00176 When validation is appropriate Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 06:14
00232 ComputerWorld's 35 technologies Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 06:26
00224 RDDL-based reification [Re: [xml-dev] More namespaces fun! james anderson 2002-10-08 08:28
00222 Re: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters [email protected] 2002-10-08 09:13
00233 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Michael Kay 2002-10-08 09:16
00175 <!-- -- --> Joe Forrest 2002-10-08 09:32
00169 RE: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Bill de hÓra 2002-10-08 09:46
00177 RE: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Bill de hÓra 2002-10-08 09:49
00164 RE: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Brussel) 2002-10-08 09:56
00181 RE: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Joe Forrest 2002-10-08 10:11
00162 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-08 10:25
00220 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: [xml-d ev] John Cowan 2002-10-08 10:25
00235 Re: [xml-dev] When validation is appropriate Jeni Tennison 2002-10-08 10:45
00236 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) John Cowan 2002-10-08 10:48
00168 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Patrick Durusau 2002-10-08 10:53
00219 validating xml Brian Shields 2002-10-08 11:04
00166 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Paul Prescod 2002-10-08 11:05
00178 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-08 11:07
00244 Re: [xml-dev] validating xml Patrick Durusau 2002-10-08 11:08
00174 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Paul Prescod 2002-10-08 11:21
00251 Sky is falling again... Paul Prescod 2002-10-08 11:41
00208 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Peter Davis 2002-10-08 11:53
00195 RE: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Bill de hÓra 2002-10-08 12:07
00198 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-08 12:17
00205 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Rich Salz 2002-10-08 12:26
00252 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Joe Forrest 2002-10-08 12:28
00242 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Rich Salz 2002-10-08 12:30
00257 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Peter Davis 2002-10-08 12:48
00239 Re: [xml-dev] validating xml Peter V. Mikhalenko 2002-10-08 12:54
00197 Re: [xml-dev] When validation is appropriate Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-08 13:11
00206 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-08 13:14
00253 Re: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Mike Champion 2002-10-08 13:21
00250 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-08 13:28
00241 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Michael Kay 2002-10-08 13:31
00245 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-08 13:32
00165 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sean McGrath 2002-10-08 13:33
00207 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-08 13:38
00196 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Joe Forrest 2002-10-08 13:39
00211 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Mike Champion 2002-10-08 13:41
00193 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Mark Baker 2002-10-08 13:43
00218 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sam Hunting 2002-10-08 13:44
00237 RE: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Michael Kay 2002-10-08 13:46
00179 RE: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Joe Forrest 2002-10-08 13:55
00180 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Sam Hunting 2002-10-08 13:56
00163 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 13:58
00221 Re: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 14:01
00223 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) John Cowan 2002-10-08 14:05
00234 Non XML syntaxes Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-08 14:05
00231 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> John Cowan 2002-10-08 14:07
00314 Re: RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Mike Champion 2002-10-08 14:09
00328 Re: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... John Cowan 2002-10-08 14:10
00285 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-08 14:10
00270 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-08 14:11
00271 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-08 14:12
00284 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes John Cowan 2002-10-08 14:13
00329 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-08 14:16
00312 Re: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 14:18
00327 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Mark Seaborne 2002-10-08 14:26
00316 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-08 14:29
00301 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Tim Bray 2002-10-08 14:30
00349 RE: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Bill de hÓra 2002-10-08 14:32
00289 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) W. E. Perry 2002-10-08 14:33
00358 Re: RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 14:35
00359 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sam Hunting 2002-10-08 14:35
00348 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sam Hunting 2002-10-08 14:41
00291 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) W. E. Perry 2002-10-08 14:45
00300 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 14:47
00304 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) John Cowan 2002-10-08 15:08
00286 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Mike Champion 2002-10-08 15:08
00302 Syntax (was Re: [xml-dev] heritage) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-08 15:08
00360 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sam Hunting 2002-10-08 15:13
00347 RE: [xml-dev] Syntax (was Re: [xml-dev] heritage) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-08 15:21
00346 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes John Cowan 2002-10-08 15:23
00282 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Patrick Durusau 2002-10-08 15:28
00361 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Sam Hunting 2002-10-08 15:28
00303 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-08 15:29
00288 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes David Carlisle 2002-10-08 15:33
00299 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-08 15:36
00290 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes John Cowan 2002-10-08 15:39
00325 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Mike Champion 2002-10-08 15:40
00317 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 15:40
00272 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... John Cowan 2002-10-08 15:42
00283 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Roger L. Costello 2002-10-08 15:44
00273 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-08 15:48
00315 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Sam Hunting 2002-10-08 16:04
00326 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes John Cowan 2002-10-08 16:09
00313 WML Character Escaping in XSL Vincent Seet 2002-10-08 16:09
00355 Re: [xml-dev] <!-- -- --> Arjun Ray 2002-10-08 16:13
00330 XSL Character Escaping for WML Vincent Seet 2002-10-08 16:14
00340 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes Mark Doyle 2002-10-08 16:40
00292 Re: [xml-dev] Non XML syntaxes W. E. Perry 2002-10-08 16:46
00310 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Tim Bray 2002-10-08 16:55
00309 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sean McGrath 2002-10-08 17:12
00354 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-08 17:17
00294 RE: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-08 17:31
00338 RE: [xml-dev] Syntax (was Re: [xml-dev] heritage) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-08 17:35
00356 Re: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Paul Prescod 2002-10-08 17:35
00343 RE: [xml-dev] Sky is falling again... Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-08 17:36
00276 The Searching Business (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distrib uted Registry Architecture) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-08 17:53
00267 RE: [xml-dev] WML Character Escaping in XSL Michael Kay 2002-10-08 17:55
00332 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Tim Bray 2002-10-08 17:55
00324 RE: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters Praj Joshi 2002-10-08 18:01
00322 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Michael Kay 2002-10-08 18:05
00333 Re: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters John Cowan 2002-10-08 18:06
00275 RE: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters Praj Joshi 2002-10-08 18:11
00269 OT: another poetry contest Lauren Wood 2002-10-08 18:13
00277 XForms Annotations (was Annotations in XPath-NG?) Micah Dubinko 2002-10-08 18:34
00264 RE: [xml-dev] OT: another poetry contest Keith W. Boone 2002-10-08 18:43
00262 RE: [xml-dev] OT: another poetry contest Jeff Lowery 2002-10-08 18:46
00281 Re: [xml-dev] OT: another poetry contest Lauren Wood 2002-10-08 18:47
00320 Re: [xml-dev] OT: another poetry contest John Cowan 2002-10-08 18:53
00335 Re: [xml-dev] Major new release of XSV Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-08 19:36
00336 Re: [xml-dev] XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?] Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-08 19:41
00319 Re: [xml-dev] OT: another poetry contest Seairth Jacobs 2002-10-08 19:47
00278 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-08 20:18
00266 Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-08 20:31
00268 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-08 20:38
00274 Re: [xml-dev] XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?] David Rosenborg 2002-10-08 20:48
00344 RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-08 20:52
00351 RE: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-08 21:36
00308 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-08 22:45
00295 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Mike Champion 2002-10-08 22:50
00298 XLink question re: arc duplication Adam van den Hoven 2002-10-09 00:31
00305 RE: [xml-dev] Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture Bill de hÓra 2002-10-09 09:00
00352 RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS bryan 2002-10-09 09:04
00357 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Sean McGrath 2002-10-09 09:05
00342 Re: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters Robin Berjon 2002-10-09 09:11
00306 RE: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters Michael Kay 2002-10-09 10:52
00297 xml validation Brian Shields 2002-10-09 11:02
00339 [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2.3 George Cristian Bina 2002-10-09 11:03
00353 RE: [xml-dev] xml validation Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Brussel) 2002-10-09 11:30
00341 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Mike Champion 2002-10-09 12:29
00345 RE: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-09 13:05
00350 RE: [xml-dev] xml validation Brian Shields 2002-10-09 13:27
00307 RE: [xml-dev] XLink question re: arc duplication Don Smith 2002-10-09 13:51
00296 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-09 13:58
00311 RE: [xml-dev] xml validation Julian Reschke 2002-10-09 14:07
00293 Re: [xml-dev] xml validation Jeff Greif 2002-10-09 14:14
00337 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Rich Salz 2002-10-09 14:21
00318 Mark Pilgrim has a good day Tim Bray 2002-10-09 14:37
00265 RE: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-09 14:39
00279 how they really feel about XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-09 14:41
00280 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-09 14:58
00263 Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Mike Champion 2002-10-09 15:02
00321 RE: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-09 15:06
00323 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00331 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00334 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00370 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00384 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00385 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00389 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00412 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00414 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00416 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00428 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00448 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00458 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:30
00371 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:32
00391 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:32
00401 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:32
00427 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:32
00429 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:32
00449 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:32
00459 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:32
00400 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-09 15:47
00387 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Rex Brooks 2002-10-09 16:27
00402 Article on the disadvantages of UDDI? Roger L. Costello 2002-10-09 17:25
00386 RE: [xml-dev] how they really feel about XML Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-09 17:50
00404 [ANN]Case Study in Website Maintenance Using XML Steve Rosenberry 2002-10-09 17:50
00460 Re: [xml-dev] how they really feel about XML Dave Winer 2002-10-09 18:29
00447 Re: [xml-dev] Article on the disadvantages of UDDI? Mark Baker 2002-10-09 19:09
00461 Re: [xml-dev] how they really feel about XML Berend de Boer 2002-10-09 20:45
00446 Re: [xml-dev] XForms Annotations (was Annotations in XPath-NG?) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-09 21:50
00403 Re: [xml-dev] Article on the disadvantages of UDDI? Paul Prescod 2002-10-10 04:26
00388 RE: evolvable formats bryan 2002-10-10 09:33
00399 RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS bryan 2002-10-10 09:34
00390 The Parable of the Languages Simon North 2002-10-10 11:13
00425 Re: [xml-dev] Article on the disadvantages of UDDI? Mike Champion 2002-10-10 12:17
00417 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-10 13:16
00372 JITTs and DOM Patrick Durusau 2002-10-10 13:40
00383 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Mike Champion 2002-10-10 13:42
00382 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Mike Champion 2002-10-10 13:50
00373 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-10 14:08
00415 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 14:13
00426 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Jeni Tennison 2002-10-10 14:14
00413 overhead Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-10 14:22
00430 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Mike Champion 2002-10-10 14:24
00455 RE: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats bryan 2002-10-10 14:30
00440 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-10 14:33
00392 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 14:44
00410 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS John Cowan 2002-10-10 15:00
00409 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 15:21
00394 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bill de hÓra 2002-10-10 15:25
00438 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 15:32
00456 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats John Cowan 2002-10-10 15:45
00432 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-10 15:49
00443 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS John Cowan 2002-10-10 15:54
00367 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bill de hÓra 2002-10-10 16:11
00454 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 16:12
00376 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 16:13
00424 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bill de hÓra 2002-10-10 16:30
00433 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS John Cowan 2002-10-10 16:45
00422 how HTTP URIs and URI references work (or don't) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-10 16:46
00375 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-10 16:48
00377 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS John Cowan 2002-10-10 17:05
00369 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Joe Gregorio 2002-10-10 17:07
00364 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-10 17:10
00381 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Paul Prescod 2002-10-10 17:12
00362 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-10 17:13
00420 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Paul Prescod 2002-10-10 17:14
00435 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Paul Prescod 2002-10-10 17:20
00436 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 17:23
00419 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 17:46
00366 RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 17:52
00378 Re: [xml-dev] XQuery and Hypertext (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web John Cowan 2002-10-10 17:53
00368 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 18:04
00444 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-10 18:19
00374 RE: [xml-dev] XForms Annotations (was Annotations in XPath-NG?) Micah Dubinko 2002-10-10 18:21
00451 RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 18:21
00408 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 18:35
00395 RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-10 18:58
00398 Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS John Cowan 2002-10-10 19:20
00405 RE: [xml-dev] XLink question re: arc duplication Adam van den Hoven 2002-10-10 19:28
00452 RE: [xml-dev] OT: another poetry contest Jeff Lowery 2002-10-10 20:42
00442 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Dave Winer 2002-10-10 23:59
00457 Processing huge XML files Thomas Lee 2002-10-11 01:43
00439 Re: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files Mike Champion 2002-10-11 02:32
00397 Re: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files Jeff Greif 2002-10-11 03:27
00406 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-11 04:00
00453 The Knights of Tag Soup (was Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats ) Mike Champion 2002-10-11 04:49
00441 RE: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-11 05:13
00445 Re: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-11 05:17
00450 anyone have some large xmi files I can have? bryan 2002-10-11 08:08
00407 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bill de hÓra 2002-10-11 08:30
00396 Re: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files [email protected] 2002-10-11 08:49
00393 RE: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup Bill de hÓra 2002-10-11 09:04
00411 RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Bill de hÓra 2002-10-11 09:04
00437 Re: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files Robin LaFontaine 2002-10-11 09:14
00418 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Jeni Tennison 2002-10-11 09:44
00365 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Patrick Durusau 2002-10-11 09:51
00379 RE: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files Michael Kay 2002-10-11 10:03
00380 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Patrick Durusau 2002-10-11 10:08
00363 Re: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-11 10:14
00421 Re: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files Thomas Lee 2002-10-11 10:25
00434 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-11 10:26
00423 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Patrick Durusau 2002-10-11 10:50
00431 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Joe Gregorio 2002-10-11 10:53
00514 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats John Cowan 2002-10-11 11:12
00509 Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace David Sheldon 2002-10-11 11:31
00528 RE: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Danny Ayers 2002-10-11 11:42
00485 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Jeni Tennison 2002-10-11 11:56
00470 RE: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Mike Champion 2002-10-11 12:22
00471 Re: [xml-dev] Great piece on RSS Paul Prescod 2002-10-11 12:30
00484 What is Tag Soup? (was Re: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup (was Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats )) Dave Winer 2002-10-11 14:19
00529 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Gavin Thomas Nicol 2002-10-11 14:28
00512 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? G. Ken Holman 2002-10-11 14:40
00527 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats John Cowan 2002-10-11 15:10
00516 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Jeni Tennison 2002-10-11 15:15
00501 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Karl Waclawek 2002-10-11 15:22
00489 Re: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup (was Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats ) Joe English 2002-10-11 15:47
00549 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Gavin Thomas Nicol 2002-10-11 16:34
00558 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Karl Waclawek 2002-10-11 17:03
00559 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Joe Gregorio 2002-10-11 17:34
00548 Re: [xml-dev] Processing huge XML files Barrie Slaymaker 2002-10-11 18:27
00491 RE: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Jelks Cabaniss 2002-10-11 20:53
00500 [ANN] XRE Joel Bender 2002-10-11 20:58
00487 RE: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web) Jelks Cabaniss 2002-10-11 21:19
00502 RE: [xml-dev] RE: SGML On The Web Jelks Cabaniss 2002-10-11 21:33
00486 [ANN] Online W3C XML Schema Validator Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-11 21:35
00504 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] Online W3C XML Schema Validator Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-11 21:43
00560 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Online W3C XML Schema Validator Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-12 04:44
00547 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] Online W3C XML Schema Validator Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-12 05:46
00546 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Patrick Durusau 2002-10-12 11:56
00561 Re: [xml-dev] JITTs and DOM Gavin Thomas Nicol 2002-10-12 14:05
00503 RE: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Danny Ayers 2002-10-12 17:48
00488 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Dave Winer 2002-10-12 18:26
00499 RE: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Danny Ayers 2002-10-12 18:44
00490 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Tim Bray 2002-10-12 20:53
00525 Should TAG consider XQuery issues? Mike Champion 2002-10-12 21:16
00517 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Seairth Jacobs 2002-10-12 22:03
00472 [ANN] XRE (repost) Joel Bender 2002-10-13 04:11
00483 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Sean McGrath 2002-10-13 09:02
00482 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-13 13:55
00473 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-13 19:37
00515 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-13 19:48
00526 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-13 19:51
00513 RDDL, UDDI, OGSA, WSDA (was ... Distributed Registry Architecture) Ken North 2002-10-13 22:31
00530 XML waves (was : Divorcing Data Model and Syntax) Danny Ayers 2002-10-14 10:19
00555 Re: [xml-dev] XML waves (was : Divorcing Data Model and Syntax) Miles Sabin 2002-10-14 11:08
00540 OASIS TC Call For Participation: Digital Signature Services Karl Best 2002-10-14 12:38
00492 Re: [xml-dev] Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-14 13:26
00510 RE: [xml-dev] XML waves (was : Divorcing Data Model and Syntax) Danny Ayers 2002-10-14 13:31
00494 URIs and XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-14 13:53
00538 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace Jeni Tennison 2002-10-14 14:09
00556 Re: [xml-dev] URIs and XML Miles Sabin 2002-10-14 14:16
00543 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Online W3C XML Schema Validator Bjoern Hoehrmann 2002-10-14 15:01
00554 subscrible QUAN yin 2002-10-14 15:54
00467 XML.gov and CIO Council join co-hosts DISA, OASIS, and W3C in sup port of XML 2002 Elledge, Marion 2002-10-14 20:32
00476 Secret Life of Markup Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-14 21:00
00532 Wired News Redesign Using The Latest Web Standards monty solomon 2002-10-14 21:46
00524 Re: [xml-dev] Wired News Redesign Using The Latest Web Standards Berend de Boer 2002-10-14 23:06
00522 RE: [xml-dev] Wired News Redesign Using The Latest Web Standards Jelks Cabaniss 2002-10-15 04:55
00533 Questions about XPointer Framework Gustaf Liljegren 2002-10-15 08:58
00475 Castor 0.9.4 available Arnaud Blandin 2002-10-15 09:10
00469 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace David Sheldon 2002-10-15 11:54
00477 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace Jeni Tennison 2002-10-15 12:13
00464 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace David Sheldon 2002-10-15 12:51
00481 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace Mark Seaborne 2002-10-15 12:56
00462 Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Chris Wilper 2002-10-15 14:51
00520 Re: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? G. Ken Holman 2002-10-15 15:40
00535 RE: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Chris Wilper 2002-10-15 16:45
00536 Re: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Tim Bray 2002-10-15 17:06
00519 RE: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-15 17:11
00466 XDocs and XForms? Mike Champion 2002-10-15 18:06
00478 Re: [xml-dev] Questions about XPointer Framework Wayne Steele 2002-10-15 18:09
00468 RE: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Chris Wilper 2002-10-15 18:10
00474 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-15 18:19
00544 Re: [xml-dev] Questions about XPointer Framework John Cowan 2002-10-15 18:21
00551 Re: RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Mike Champion 2002-10-15 18:32
00508 Re: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Arjun Ray 2002-10-15 18:35
00495 RE: RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-15 18:50
00498 RE: RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-15 18:52
00505 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Mike Champion 2002-10-15 19:08
00552 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Mike Champion 2002-10-15 19:21
00542 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Arjun Ray 2002-10-15 19:32
00557 Re: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Arjun Ray 2002-10-15 20:10
00539 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-15 20:13
00497 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-15 20:19
00506 The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-15 20:29
00553 RE: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Chris Wilper 2002-10-15 20:40
00541 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Mike Champion 2002-10-15 20:43
00545 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-15 20:45
00550 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-15 20:57
00507 Re: RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Mike Champion 2002-10-15 20:58
00496 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Steve Muench 2002-10-15 22:33
00511 Relative URLs using the file scheme? Eddie Robertsson 2002-10-15 23:39
00493 RE: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Michael Fitzgerald 2002-10-16 00:00
00537 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Eddie Robertsson 2002-10-16 00:43
00518 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Paul Prescod 2002-10-16 02:10
00465 Discussion about XML Specification(SE) Collin 2002-10-16 02:41
00479 Re: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup (was Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats ) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-16 02:55
00480 Re: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-16 02:58
00463 Re: [xml-dev] RE: evolvable formats Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-16 03:11
00521 Reminder: Seminar on Topic Maps in New York, Nov. 18 Nikita Ogievetsky 2002-10-16 04:29
00534 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-16 05:01
00523 Re: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-16 07:09
00531 Re: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-16 07:20
00614 Re: [xml-dev] Identify PUBLICID outside of dtd? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-16 07:28
00628 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Eddie Robertsson 2002-10-16 07:45
00585 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-16 07:59
00570 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? [email protected] 2002-10-16 08:48
00571 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Daniel Veillard 2002-10-16 08:54
00584 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? m batsis 2002-10-16 09:02
00629 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? bryan 2002-10-16 09:17
00612 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 09:46
00627 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Paul Prescod 2002-10-16 10:34
00616 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 10:36
00601 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Paul Prescod 2002-10-16 10:37
00589 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Robin Berjon 2002-10-16 10:46
00649 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Daniel Veillard 2002-10-16 10:52
00658 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 10:52
00659 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 10:56
00648 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 11:09
00591 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? james anderson 2002-10-16 11:23
00600 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 11:38
00587 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 11:41
00602 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 11:49
00586 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Daniel Veillard 2002-10-16 11:58
00604 Namespaces Peter Finch 2002-10-16 12:27
00660 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces John Cowan 2002-10-16 12:44
00647 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 12:47
00646 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Robin Berjon 2002-10-16 12:52
00661 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Amelia A Lewis 2002-10-16 12:59
00603 RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces bryan 2002-10-16 13:09
00588 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 13:23
00599 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Karl Waclawek 2002-10-16 13:26
00590 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 13:33
00625 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Karl Waclawek 2002-10-16 13:51
00572 Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-16 13:59
00582 Typo Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-16 14:06
00617 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Jeni Tennison 2002-10-16 14:06
00583 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 14:18
00573 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 14:24
00615 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-16 14:26
00613 Separation of Concerns (was Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published) Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-16 14:26
00626 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 14:34
00630 RE: [xml-dev] Discussion about XML Specification(SE) Keith W. Boone 2002-10-16 14:41
00655 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published David Carlisle 2002-10-16 14:48
00640 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 14:56
00592 Re: [xml-dev] Separation of Concerns (was Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published) Karl Waclawek 2002-10-16 14:58
00610 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Karl Waclawek 2002-10-16 14:58
00609 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-16 15:03
00594 RE: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 15:05
00638 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Arjun Ray 2002-10-16 15:09
00656 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 15:30
00643 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Mike Champion 2002-10-16 15:42
00654 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Joe English 2002-10-16 15:54
00567 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published [email protected] 2002-10-16 15:58
00576 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Jeni Tennison 2002-10-16 16:26
00632 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Richard Tobin 2002-10-16 16:37
00624 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Rich Salz 2002-10-16 16:39
00622 RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 16:42
00633 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Richard Tobin 2002-10-16 16:45
00575 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 16:48
00569 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Paul Prescod 2002-10-16 17:16
00577 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 17:27
00564 Java String to Doc Amit Thakkar 2002-10-16 17:33
00581 Re: [xml-dev] Java String to Doc Wayne Steele 2002-10-16 17:36
00562 Re: [xml-dev] Java String to Doc Amit Thakkar 2002-10-16 17:36
00620 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Ann Navarro 2002-10-16 17:44
00635 XML Specs (was Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published) David Megginson 2002-10-16 17:56
00636 Re: [xml-dev] Discussion about XML Specification(SE) Wayne Steele 2002-10-16 18:11
00619 Re: [xml-dev] Java String to Doc Jeff Greif 2002-10-16 18:23
00566 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 18:37
00578 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Tim Bray 2002-10-16 18:51
00568 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Arjun Ray 2002-10-16 18:56
00574 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published Daniel Veillard 2002-10-16 19:05
00644 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Tim Bray 2002-10-16 19:14
00651 fwd: metaphorical Web Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-16 19:20
00595 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 19:22
00608 RE: [xml-dev] Questions about XPointer Framework Ron Daniel 2002-10-16 19:23
00598 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published John Cowan 2002-10-16 19:42
00605 Who's afraid of the big bad Bob? [Was XML Specs] Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-16 20:10
00652 RE: [xml-dev] Who's afraid of the big bad Bob? [Was XML Specs] Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 20:16
00642 RE: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Chris Wilper 2002-10-16 20:22
00639 RE: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-16 20:28
00657 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-16 20:29
00597 a minimal SAX application in Java Michael Fitzgerald 2002-10-16 20:31
00606 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces J.Pietschmann 2002-10-16 20:38
00653 Re: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-16 20:54
00641 Re: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Miles Sabin 2002-10-16 20:56
00645 Re: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-16 21:03
00650 RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces Jeff Lowery 2002-10-16 21:04
00607 RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces Jeff Lowery 2002-10-16 21:07
00596 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Richard Tobin 2002-10-16 21:12
00611 Invitation to a Technology Preview for Sun ONE Integration Server, Secure Trading Agent carine 2002-10-16 21:19
00593 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Jeni Tennison 2002-10-16 21:21
00637 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Tim Bray 2002-10-16 21:22
00618 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation John Cowan 2002-10-16 21:37
00565 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Richard Tobin 2002-10-16 21:45
00579 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Jeni Tennison 2002-10-16 21:50
00580 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Paul Prescod 2002-10-16 22:28
00563 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation G. Ken Holman 2002-10-16 22:31
00634 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation John Cowan 2002-10-16 22:40
00621 Dynamic selection of Schema Naren Koka 2002-10-16 22:41
00623 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? james anderson 2002-10-16 22:45
00631 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-16 22:57
00714 RE: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 2002-10-16 23:01
00728 RE: [xml-dev] Dynamic selection of Schema Jeff Lowery 2002-10-16 23:14
00685 RE: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Don Box 2002-10-16 23:15
00670 Re: [xml-dev] Dynamic selection of Schema Jeff Greif 2002-10-16 23:23
00671 RE: [xml-dev] Dynamic selection of Schema Jeff Lowery 2002-10-16 23:38
00684 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces Peter Finch 2002-10-16 23:50
00729 ANN: Gorille 0.5 Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 00:08
00712 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 01:14
00727 RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces Rich Salz 2002-10-17 01:27
00716 Re: [xml-dev] Who's afraid of the big bad Bob? [Was XML Specs] [email protected] 2002-10-17 02:11
00701 Re: [xml-dev] a minimal SAX application in Java George Cristian Bina 2002-10-17 07:16
00689 Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) [email protected] 2002-10-17 08:20
00749 New Generation Browsers (Was: XDocs and XForms?) [email protected] 2002-10-17 08:28
00758 Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? [email protected] 2002-10-17 08:41
00748 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Joshua Allen 2002-10-17 09:01
00759 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) m batsis 2002-10-17 09:01
00691 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? m batsis 2002-10-17 09:11
00700 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) [email protected] 2002-10-17 09:20
00687 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) m batsis 2002-10-17 09:36
00702 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) [email protected] 2002-10-17 09:40
00686 Re: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Miles Sabin 2002-10-17 09:48
00704 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) [email protected] 2002-10-17 10:23
00760 RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? bryan 2002-10-17 10:50
00746 Re: [xml-dev] Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-17 11:07
00747 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? m batsis 2002-10-17 11:20
00761 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Bill de hÓra 2002-10-17 12:00
00703 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? G. Ken Holman 2002-10-17 12:24
00688 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? m batsis 2002-10-17 12:46
00699 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-17 13:33
00725 RE: New Generation Browsers (Was: XDocs and XForms?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-17 14:08
00690 RE: [xml-dev] a minimal SAX application in Java Keith W. Boone 2002-10-17 14:08
00717 line-ends and char refs Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 14:15
00672 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 14:15
00683 Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 14:20
00682 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 14:24
00673 Re: [xml-dev] line-ends and char refs Richard Tobin 2002-10-17 14:32
00715 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Gert Baudoncq 2002-10-17 14:34
00726 Re: [xml-dev] line-ends and char refs Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 14:35
00713 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Gert Baudoncq 2002-10-17 14:36
00730 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XF orms?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-17 14:39
00755 Re: [xml-dev] New Generation Browsers (Was: XDocs and XForms?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 14:42
00740 Re: [xml-dev] New Generation Browsers (Was: XDocs and XForms?) [email protected] 2002-10-17 14:56
00692 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) [email protected] 2002-10-17 15:02
00710 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XF orms?) Mike Champion 2002-10-17 15:08
00709 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XF orms?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 15:12
00694 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Gert Baudoncq 2002-10-17 15:14
00738 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 15:16
00756 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XF orms?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-17 15:17
00743 The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Mike Champion 2002-10-17 15:40
00754 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-17 15:45
00667 Re: RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Mike Champion 2002-10-17 15:55
00676 Re: [xml-dev] line-ends and char refs John Cowan 2002-10-17 16:09
00732 Re: [xml-dev] line-ends and char refs Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 16:35
00724 XML, routing Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 17:07
00722 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Joshua Allen 2002-10-17 17:15
00733 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Bill de hÓra 2002-10-17 17:19
00675 RE: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Don Box 2002-10-17 17:33
00669 RE: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 17:41
00677 Re: [xml-dev] XML, routing W. E. Perry 2002-10-17 18:57
00664 Re: [xml-dev] XML, routing Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 19:15
00681 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-17 19:42
00662 Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Andrzej Jan Taramina 2002-10-17 19:52
00720 Re: [xml-dev] fwd: metaphorical Web Miles Sabin 2002-10-17 19:59
00735 Re: [xml-dev] XML, routing J.Pietschmann 2002-10-17 20:01
00736 OASIS TC Call For Participation: e-Government TC Karl Best 2002-10-17 20:04
00719 Re: [xml-dev] XML, routing Miles Sabin 2002-10-17 20:13
00666 Re: [xml-dev] XML, routing Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 20:25
00668 Perl Filter Implementation of JITTs Patrick Durusau 2002-10-17 20:32
00678 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-17 20:50
00674 Re: [xml-dev] XML, routing Miles Sabin 2002-10-17 20:57
00744 Re: [xml-dev] XML, routing Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-17 21:09
00751 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-17 21:22
00708 DTD/Schema for biological/biomedical datasets Karen Harker 2002-10-17 21:39
00695 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-17 23:06
00698 Re: [xml-dev] DTD/Schema for biological/biomedical datasets Rex Brooks 2002-10-17 23:40
00705 Yucks from IBM Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-18 03:33
00752 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-18 06:18
00742 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-18 07:28
00757 RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? bryan 2002-10-18 08:16
00739 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 08:43
00697 RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? bryan 2002-10-18 09:24
00753 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 09:43
00745 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 09:52
00750 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-18 09:53
00706 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Rosenborg 2002-10-18 09:53
00741 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Rosenborg 2002-10-18 10:06
00696 RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? bryan 2002-10-18 10:23
00707 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Rosenborg 2002-10-18 10:31
00711 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 10:38
00693 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Norman Walsh 2002-10-18 10:41
00737 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-18 10:54
00718 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 11:03
00665 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-18 12:02
00679 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 12:38
00663 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? John Cowan 2002-10-18 12:48
00680 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? [email protected] 2002-10-18 12:48
00721 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? [email protected] 2002-10-18 12:53
00734 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-18 12:59
00731 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 13:01
00723 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?) Robin Berjon 2002-10-18 13:02
00814 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 13:05
00785 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 13:06
00770 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 13:08
00771 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 13:16
00828 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Rosenborg 2002-10-18 13:21
00829 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? [email protected] 2002-10-18 13:21
00812 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Norman Walsh 2002-10-18 13:22
00827 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 13:24
00801 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 13:27
00784 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? m batsis 2002-10-18 13:27
00789 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? John Cowan 2002-10-18 13:28
00849 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-18 13:29
00858 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? [email protected] 2002-10-18 13:29
00859 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 13:33
00791 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-18 13:36
00848 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? [email protected] 2002-10-18 13:37
00816 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Rosenborg 2002-10-18 13:40
00800 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 13:41
00787 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 13:45
00802 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? John Cowan 2002-10-18 13:48
00786 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 14:09
00804 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? David Carlisle 2002-10-18 14:15
00860 RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? bryan 2002-10-18 14:16
00847 architectural forms and schema type derivation Bob DuCharme 2002-10-18 14:20
00846 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 14:27
00861 RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? bryan 2002-10-18 14:31
00803 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? G. Ken Holman 2002-10-18 14:36
00790 RE: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2002-10-18 14:38
00788 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 14:42
00799 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-18 14:52
00825 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-18 15:21
00817 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 15:21
00772 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 15:48
00783 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Rotterdam) 2002-10-18 15:50
00782 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? John Cowan 2002-10-18 15:51
00773 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Paul Prescod 2002-10-18 15:54
00826 Slashdot on XML 1.1 Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-18 16:01
00813 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-18 16:02
00815 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! [email protected] 2002-10-18 16:02
00830 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-18 16:13
00855 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Mike Champion 2002-10-18 16:17
00792 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Ian Tindale 2002-10-18 16:24
00840 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! m batsis 2002-10-18 16:32
00854 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2002-10-18 16:33
00810 Re: [xml-dev] Slashdot on XML 1.1 John Cowan 2002-10-18 16:33
00809 Annotation to transformation (was Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-18 16:53
00856 Re: [xml-dev] DTD/Schema for biological/biomedical datasets Karen Harker 2002-10-18 17:19
00794 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Paul Prescod 2002-10-18 17:59
00838 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-18 18:28
00843 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-18 19:02
00767 XDocs, XForms and Standards [email protected] 2002-10-18 19:16
00776 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-18 20:36
00832 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-18 21:08
00824 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs, XForms and Standards Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III 2002-10-18 23:08
00822 Which is better (for medical data)? Elizabeth Hinson 2002-10-18 23:25
00833 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs, XForms and Standards Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-18 23:42
00775 Re: [xml-dev] Which is better (for medical data)? Frank 2002-10-19 00:22
00769 RE: [xml-dev] XDocs, XForms and Standards Mike Champion 2002-10-19 00:46
00777 SVG and embedded images? Andrzej Jan Taramina 2002-10-19 01:24
00764 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs, XForms and Standards Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III 2002-10-19 01:24
00781 Re: [xml-dev] Which is better (for medical data)? Mike Champion 2002-10-19 01:24
00762 Re: [xml-dev] XDocs, XForms and Standards Mike Champion 2002-10-19 01:32
00820 RE: [xml-dev] Which is better (for medical data)? Paul Brown 2002-10-19 01:47
00835 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-19 02:16
00836 Re: [xml-dev] SVG and embedded images? Paul Prescod 2002-10-19 02:20
00819 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Karl Waclawek 2002-10-19 04:42
00766 Re: [xml-dev] architectural forms and schema type derivation Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-19 04:50
00778 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-19 05:08
00768 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-19 05:30
00774 Re: [xml-dev] SVG and embedded images? [email protected] 2002-10-19 08:38
00844 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Sean McGrath 2002-10-19 09:14
00851 Re: [xml-dev] Which is better (for medical data)? akmal @ city 2002-10-19 10:36
00795 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-19 14:01
00808 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Karl Waclawek 2002-10-19 14:15
00805 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-19 14:33
00798 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Karl Waclawek 2002-10-19 14:51
00852 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-19 15:07
00842 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-19 15:07
00857 OT Dr C.E.M. Joad (was Re: [xml-dev] Which is better (for medical data)?) [email protected] 2002-10-19 15:17
00839 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? John Cowan 2002-10-19 15:25
00797 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-19 16:38
00806 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Karl Waclawek 2002-10-19 18:26
00853 XDocs Joshua Allen 2002-10-19 19:06
00841 ANN: Tutorial on Building XML-Based Web Services Roger L. Costello 2002-10-19 20:05
00845 Re: [xml-dev] Which is better (for medical data)? Ken North 2002-10-19 20:43
00850 Re: [xml-dev] Which is better (for medical data)? Ken North 2002-10-19 21:50
00796 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-19 22:31
00807 Java package for XPath 1.0 Kiril Simov 2002-10-19 22:35
00793 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-19 23:24
00811 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Karl Waclawek 2002-10-19 23:32
00837 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-20 15:54
00818 RE: [xml-dev] Java package for XPath 1.0 Michael Kay 2002-10-20 17:31
00779 Re: [xml-dev] architectural forms and schema type derivation Bob DuCharme 2002-10-20 17:38
00765 RE: [xml-dev] Java package for XPath 1.0 Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-20 17:40
00780 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-20 20:02
00821 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-20 20:06
00763 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-20 20:08
00834 Re: [xml-dev] What is Tag Soup? Daniel Dui 2002-10-20 20:09
00823 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-20 20:21
00831 Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C?? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-20 20:30
00914 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset John Cowan 2002-10-22 10:34
00928 Re: [xml-dev] How to print multiple spaces in my document with XSLT Collin 2002-10-22 11:05
00885 Re: [xml-dev] How to print multiple spaces in my document with XSLT David Carlisle 2002-10-22 11:18
00870 Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and other specs Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-22 11:19
00871 Re: [xml-dev] How to print multiple spaces in my document with XSLT Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-22 12:10
00884 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-22 12:19
00929 RE: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and other specs Michael Kay 2002-10-22 13:28
00912 Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and other specs John Cowan 2002-10-22 13:30
00927 Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and other specs Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-22 13:49
00916 Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and other specs John Cowan 2002-10-22 14:22
00901 XML Introduction Zukile Hutu 2002-10-22 14:36
00889 RE: [xml-dev] XML Introduction Delli Zuani Emiliano 2002-10-22 14:40
00949 Fwd: XQuery Article Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-22 14:40
00958 RELAX NG compact notation Eric Middleton 2002-10-22 14:52
00959 ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-22 15:11
00948 Re: [xml-dev] Fwd: XQuery Article Robin Berjon 2002-10-22 15:14
00900 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG compact notation Eric Middleton 2002-10-22 15:24
00891 Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG compact notation David Rosenborg 2002-10-22 15:36
00887 Comparison between SAX parser Enrico Prosperi 2002-10-22 15:49
00902 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Paul Prescod 2002-10-22 16:00
00886 Re: [xml-dev] Comparison between SAX parser Karl Waclawek 2002-10-22 16:04
00904 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! [email protected] 2002-10-22 16:42
00960 XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Mike Champion 2002-10-22 16:43
00947 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-22 16:56
00946 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Jonathan Robie 2002-10-22 16:58
00961 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-22 17:07
00903 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Jonathan Robie 2002-10-22 17:21
00888 RE: RE: [xml-dev] XDocs and XForms? Micah Dubinko 2002-10-22 17:26
00899 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset Gustaf Liljegren 2002-10-22 17:36
00890 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-22 17:55
00925 RE: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wa rs are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-22 19:03
00917 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Paul Prescod 2002-10-22 21:15
00872 Re: [xml-dev] Perceived C/B for XML 1.1 Daniel Veillard 2002-10-22 21:27
00883 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! J.Pietschmann 2002-10-22 21:31
00882 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset Daniel Veillard 2002-10-22 21:37
00873 XML 1.1 Names Peter Finch 2002-10-22 22:10
00915 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset Paul Prescod 2002-10-22 23:36
00926 XML 1.1 documents Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-23 00:20
00913 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-23 01:21
00930 Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 documents John Cowan 2002-10-23 03:10
00955 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) [email protected] 2002-10-23 07:32
00940 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! [email protected] 2002-10-23 08:16
00892 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset [email protected] 2002-10-23 08:30
00910 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) [email protected] 2002-10-23 08:36
00909 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! [email protected] 2002-10-23 08:47
00894 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wa rs are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-23 09:01
00938 R: [xml-dev] Comparison between SAX parser Enrico Prosperi 2002-10-23 09:28
00956 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-23 09:32
00943 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-23 09:39
00954 RE: [xml-dev] R: [xml-dev] Comparison between SAX parser Gert Baudoncq 2002-10-23 10:19
00867 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! [email protected] 2002-10-23 11:48
00876 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Brussel) 2002-10-23 12:25
00932 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-23 12:32
00924 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Brussel) 2002-10-23 12:32
00922 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-23 12:35
00933 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-23 12:38
00875 Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-23 12:53
00869 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-23 13:00
00877 The Browser Is Melting! Long Live the Smart Document! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-23 13:32
00864 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! [email protected] 2002-10-23 13:35
00881 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! John Cowan 2002-10-23 13:48
00862 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! [email protected] 2002-10-23 13:56
00920 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-23 13:58
00935 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Danny Ayers 2002-10-23 14:02
00919 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Sean McGrath 2002-10-23 14:14
00878 Re: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-23 14:15
00936 Why not a Web Conductor? (Was: The Browser Is Melting!) [email protected] 2002-10-23 14:16
00866 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! John Cowan 2002-10-23 14:21
00868 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! [email protected] 2002-10-23 14:25
00874 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Richard Tobin 2002-10-23 14:25
00944 RE: Why not a Web Conductor? (Was: The Browser Is Melting!) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-23 14:27
00951 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser John Cowan 2002-10-23 14:30
00908 Re: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars Richard Tobin 2002-10-23 14:34
00895 Re: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars John Cowan 2002-10-23 14:34
00898 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! John Cowan 2002-10-23 14:35
00905 Re: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-23 14:43
00942 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! bryan 2002-10-23 14:48
00957 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Robin Berjon 2002-10-23 14:49
00952 XML Europe 2003 Call for Participation Elledge, Marion 2002-10-23 14:53
00939 Re: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars John Cowan 2002-10-23 14:56
00897 Re: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-23 14:57
00906 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars! Rich Salz 2002-10-23 15:10
00953 Modularity of specs Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-23 15:20
00941 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Joe English 2002-10-23 15:24
00945 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-23 15:27
00950 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser John Cowan 2002-10-23 16:01
00907 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The BrowserWars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-23 16:06
00896 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Karl Waclawek 2002-10-23 16:18
00911 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Seairth Jacobs 2002-10-23 16:49
00893 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Karl Waclawek 2002-10-23 16:56
00937 RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web? Danny Ayers 2002-10-23 17:00
00918 OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") Jeff Lowery 2002-10-23 17:46
00865 RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-23 17:53
00879 RE: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-23 18:05
00880 RE: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data" ) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-23 18:08
00863 Re: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") Karl Waclawek 2002-10-23 18:20
00921 Re: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") John Cowan 2002-10-23 18:30
00934 RE: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data" ) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-23 18:33
00923 Re: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") John Cowan 2002-10-23 18:37
00931 Re: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") John Cowan 2002-10-23 18:39
01014 Re: [xml-dev] Semantic web? [email protected] 2002-10-23 19:03
01028 RE: [xml-dev] Semantic web? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-23 19:13
00985 What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-23 19:32
00970 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) [email protected] 2002-10-23 19:51
00971 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) [email protected] 2002-10-23 20:19
00984 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Berend de Boer 2002-10-23 20:29
01029 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-23 21:44
01012 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset Tim Bray 2002-10-23 21:46
01027 RE: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-23 22:01
01016 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Rich Salz 2002-10-23 22:23
01001 [<[email protected]>] Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) [email protected] 2002-10-23 22:40
00989 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Tim Bray 2002-10-23 23:05
01049 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Rich Salz 2002-10-23 23:25
01058 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Anupam Singh 2002-10-23 23:48
01059 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Rich Salz 2002-10-24 00:01
01048 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Jeff Lowery 2002-10-24 00:15
00991 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Rich Salz 2002-10-24 00:24
01000 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Jeff Lowery 2002-10-24 00:43
00987 HTML A attributes: what people actually use Bob DuCharme 2002-10-24 00:48
01002 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Rich Salz 2002-10-24 01:04
00986 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-24 01:30
01004 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Trevor Croll 2002-10-24 01:33
01060 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Paul Prescod 2002-10-24 01:36
01047 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Lars Marius Garshol 2002-10-24 01:43
01046 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Paul Prescod 2002-10-24 01:47
01061 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Matt Gushee 2002-10-24 01:50
01003 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa John Cowan 2002-10-24 02:30
00988 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa John Cowan 2002-10-24 02:33
00999 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! John Cowan 2002-10-24 02:37
00990 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser John Cowan 2002-10-24 02:38
01025 private vs. public (was Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data") Seairth Jacobs 2002-10-24 03:32
01017 Since xsl:script and xsl:eval are not recommended, so is there other equavalent meahanism provided in XSL? Collin 2002-10-24 03:45
00972 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Trevor Croll 2002-10-24 04:24
00983 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-24 06:27
00982 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-24 08:58
00973 Research Topic in B2B Communication -XML Ranjith Kodikara 2002-10-24 09:12
01015 Re: OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-24 09:17
01026 MS office XML [email protected] 2002-10-24 09:25
01013 Re: [xml-dev] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") Robin Berjon 2002-10-24 09:28
01030 Re: [xml-dev] Since xsl:script and xsl:eval are not recommended, so is there other equavalent meahanism provided in XSL? Jeni Tennison 2002-10-24 09:35
01055 Re: [xml-dev] Research Topic in B2B Communication -XML Pavithran 2002-10-24 09:43
01040 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-24 10:09
00992 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) [email protected] 2002-10-24 10:14
01010 Re: [xml-dev] Specifying a Unicode subset [email protected] 2002-10-24 10:16
01462 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Mark Seaborne 2002-10-24 10:16
01009 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? John Cowan 2002-10-24 10:38
00994 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? bryan 2002-10-24 10:59
01038 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-24 11:15
01056 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-24 12:10
01043 Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) Mike Champion 2002-10-24 12:17
01054 RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) Mark Seaborne 2002-10-24 12:30
00967 W3C and Linking - what is the future? [email protected] 2002-10-24 12:34
00976 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) [email protected] 2002-10-24 12:44
01032 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? John Cowan 2002-10-24 12:54
01024 A kind request. Urgent Leela Arumugavelayutham 2002-10-24 12:55
01022 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) John Cowan 2002-10-24 12:56
01033 Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? John Cowan 2002-10-24 12:59
00977 [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-24 13:05
00975 Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? Mike Champion 2002-10-24 13:19
00969 Re: [xml-dev] A kind request. Urgent m a r l o n . n e l s o n 2002-10-24 13:25
00964 Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? [email protected] 2002-10-24 13:44
00981 DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-24 13:58
00962 RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) Mark Seaborne 2002-10-24 14:10
01020 RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML F or?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-24 14:22
01035 Re: [xml-dev] DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-24 14:23
01036 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) Tim Bray 2002-10-24 14:27
01019 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-24 14:31
00966 Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? John Cowan 2002-10-24 14:41
00978 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-24 14:43
00968 RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML F or?) Mike Champion 2002-10-24 14:44
00974 Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? John Cowan 2002-10-24 14:44
01044 Re: [xml-dev] DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-24 14:55
01051 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML F John Cowan 2002-10-24 15:04
00995 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) John Cowan 2002-10-24 15:06
01008 Re: [xml-dev] Unicode Support in XMl A SG 2002-10-24 15:07
00998 Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? [email protected] 2002-10-24 15:10
01005 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) [email protected] 2002-10-24 15:12
01052 Re: [xml-dev] DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-24 15:14
01042 Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future? John Cowan 2002-10-24 15:56
01057 Re: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For?) John Cowan 2002-10-24 15:57
01039 Re: [xml-dev] DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS? John Cowan 2002-10-24 16:01
00997 [ANN] Microsoft XSD Inference Tool Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-24 16:04
01006 Re: [xml-dev] DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS? Jeni Tennison 2002-10-24 16:05
01053 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-24 17:48
01041 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-24 17:49
01045 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-24 18:12
01050 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-24 18:13
01007 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Jeff Lowery 2002-10-24 18:35
00996 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-24 18:40
01011 Late Breaking News, Vendor Sessions, and XML Art Gallery Announce d for XML 2002 Elledge, Marion 2002-10-24 18:46
00993 RE: OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data") Jeff Lowery 2002-10-24 18:54
01037 We interrupt your regularly scheduled rants... John Cowan 2002-10-24 19:08
01018 RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML F Jeff Lowery 2002-10-24 19:36
00965 RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML F Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-24 19:42
00979 RE: [xml-dev] Profundity du jour (was Re: [xml-dev] What is XML F Jeff Lowery 2002-10-24 20:01
00980 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-24 20:27
00963 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Ken North 2002-10-24 21:00
01021 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-24 22:08
01034 Re: [xml-dev] MS office XML Justin Lipton 2002-10-24 22:16
01031 RE: [xml-dev] MS office XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-24 22:19
01023 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! J.Pietschmann 2002-10-24 22:20
01114 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-24 22:29
01128 Re: [xml-dev] MS office XML Tim Bray 2002-10-24 23:03
01085 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Fredrik Lindgren 2002-10-24 23:32
01070 Can user input in browser be fed back to XSLT? Collin 2002-10-25 03:00
01071 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-25 06:23
01084 Could you guys tell me any excellent XML-based site ? Collin 2002-10-25 07:11
01129 We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-25 07:30
01112 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Mark Seaborne 2002-10-25 07:49
01127 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-25 08:56
01116 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-25 09:08
01101 Re: [xml-dev] MS office XML Robin Berjon 2002-10-25 09:29
01089 testing only... Jose Rodriguez 2002-10-25 09:45
01149 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Michael Kay 2002-10-25 10:01
01158 RE: [xml-dev] XML 1.1 and other specs Michael Kay 2002-10-25 10:05
01159 flush a DOM tree to a text file Jose Rodriguez 2002-10-25 10:05
01148 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-25 10:17
01091 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 John Cowan 2002-10-25 10:23
01100 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-25 10:34
01087 RE: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars Michael Kay 2002-10-25 10:41
01102 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! [email protected] 2002-10-25 10:53
01104 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-25 10:55
01086 RE: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Michael Kay 2002-10-25 10:57
01160 RE: [xml-dev] Blanchard's Law, was: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-25 11:11
01147 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-25 11:25
01146 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 John Cowan 2002-10-25 11:33
01161 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-25 11:35
01103 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Robin Berjon 2002-10-25 11:45
01088 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-25 11:53
01099 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Danny Ayers 2002-10-25 11:58
01090 RE: [xml-dev] Could you guys tell me any excellent XML-based site ? Danny Ayers 2002-10-25 12:14
01125 Re: [xml-dev] Could you guys tell me any excellent XML-based site ? [email protected] 2002-10-25 12:53
01117 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Karl Waclawek 2002-10-25 13:03
01072 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-25 13:21
01083 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-25 13:43
01082 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML John Cowan 2002-10-25 14:14
01073 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-25 14:36
01115 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML John Cowan 2002-10-25 14:46
01126 RE: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Joshua Allen 2002-10-25 14:52
01113 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Robin Berjon 2002-10-25 14:54
01130 RE: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-25 14:55
01155 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML John Cowan 2002-10-25 15:04
01140 Design of streamform declaration. Chris Wilper 2002-10-25 15:26
01092 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-25 15:28
01110 RE: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-25 15:35
01109 XML versions and conformance (was RE: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML) Mike Champion 2002-10-25 16:34
01094 RE: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-25 16:40
01138 Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..) [email protected] 2002-10-25 16:57
01156 Priority XML errata and design issues? [email protected] 2002-10-25 16:59
01143 Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..) John Cowan 2002-10-25 17:04
01154 [ANN] Tool to translate XML Schemas into ASN.1 modules Fabrice Desré 2002-10-25 17:09
01067 Tight binding with backend systems (Was: What is XML For?) Anupam Singh 2002-10-25 17:15
01076 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..) [email protected] 2002-10-25 17:22
01132 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-25 17:28
01124 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..) Joe Gregorio 2002-10-25 17:36
01122 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..) John Cowan 2002-10-25 17:39
01133 Oracle table to XML file Wesley STROOP 2002-10-25 17:45
01075 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..) Chris Wilper 2002-10-25 17:47
01069 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Living Documents (Was: We need SAX etc ..) [email protected] 2002-10-25 17:50
01077 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-25 18:18
01064 RE: [xml-dev] Tight binding with backend systems (Was: What is XM L For?) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-25 18:35
01081 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-25 18:39
01062 RE: [xml-dev] MS office XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-25 19:07
01120 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 20:03
01135 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 20:11
01136 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 20:15
01119 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 20:23
01078 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! John Cowan 2002-10-25 20:31
01068 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-25 20:33
01066 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! David LeBlanc 2002-10-25 20:35
01074 Languages named for mediocre comedy, dictionaries, generators and XML processing Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 20:46
01144 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 21:02
01151 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser John Cowan 2002-10-25 21:03
01108 Re: [xml-dev] Semantic web? Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 21:15
01095 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 21:29
01098 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! David LeBlanc 2002-10-25 21:36
01152 [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Ken North 2002-10-25 21:36
01142 RE: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Jeff Lowery 2002-10-25 21:37
01105 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 21:39
01157 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) [email protected] 2002-10-25 21:48
01139 Re: [xml-dev] Java package for XPath 1.0 Tom Bradford 2002-10-25 22:17
01097 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 22:25
01106 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-25 22:34
01153 Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs! Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-25 22:44
01141 Re: [xml-dev] Oracle table to XML file Steve Muench 2002-10-25 23:56
01145 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Anupam Singh 2002-10-26 00:25
01150 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Al B. Snell 2002-10-26 01:07
01107 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Ken North 2002-10-26 04:57
01096 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 05:51
01111 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-26 06:32
01093 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) [email protected] 2002-10-26 08:23
01137 [Fwd: Defining "public interfaces" in specifications] Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-26 08:26
01118 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-26 08:33
01065 RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: Defining "public interfaces" in specifications] Danny Ayers 2002-10-26 10:12
01079 Why transformNode method does not work on some machines with IE5.0?But it works all well on my machine(IE 5.0). Collin 2002-10-26 11:08
01080 Re: [xml-dev] Why transformNode method does not work on some machines with IE5.0?But it works all well on my machine(IE 5.0). Jeni Tennison 2002-10-26 11:19
01063 Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-26 12:47
01121 Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: Defining "public interfaces" in specifications] Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-26 13:00
01134 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-26 14:40
01123 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Mike Champion 2002-10-26 15:14
01131 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-26 16:11
01214 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 16:34
01228 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 16:39
01185 Updated Schema Quick Reference cards Danny Vint 2002-10-26 16:49
01170 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-26 17:19
01171 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Paul Prescod 2002-10-26 17:36
01184 XInclude: security risk 1 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-26 17:47
01229 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 18:03
01212 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 David Megginson 2002-10-26 18:11
01227 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 Miles Sabin 2002-10-26 18:16
01216 What are Schemas For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-26 18:24
01201 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-26 18:33
01189 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-26 18:36
01249 XForms and XDocs (Was: MS office XML) [email protected] 2002-10-26 19:01
01258 Re: What are Schemas For? [email protected] 2002-10-26 19:21
01259 Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For? Patrick Phalen 2002-10-26 19:53
01248 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 19:58
01191 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 20:01
01200 Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For? J.Pietschmann 2002-10-26 20:05
01187 Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For?) Mike Champion 2002-10-26 20:16
01202 Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For? [email protected] 2002-10-26 20:19
01186 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For?) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 20:48
01204 Re: [xml-dev] XML as a type .. was [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Ken North 2002-10-26 21:27
01260 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... [email protected] 2002-10-26 21:43
01247 The XML 500 word Challenge [email protected] 2002-10-26 21:56
01246 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... [email protected] 2002-10-26 22:00
01261 Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For? Amelia A Lewis 2002-10-26 22:08
01203 Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For? [email protected] 2002-10-26 22:17
01172 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-26 22:48
01188 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-26 23:09
01199 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Mike Champion 2002-10-26 23:11
01225 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 Richard Tobin 2002-10-26 23:13
01190 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-26 23:18
01217 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-26 23:21
01183 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-26 23:38
01182 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-27 00:03
01173 RE: [xml-dev] XML as a type .. was [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-27 00:04
01215 evaluating XPointers Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-27 00:07
01213 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-27 00:24
01226 XPath and XMLFilter Martin Soukup 2002-10-27 00:25
01230 Blocking calls in SAX parsers Martin Soukup 2002-10-27 00:58
01255 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-27 01:03
01240 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 Rich Salz 2002-10-27 02:15
01210 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For?) Mike Champion 2002-10-27 03:09
01192 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... Alaric Snell 2002-10-27 03:09
01209 Re: [xml-dev] evaluating XPointers Kian-Tat Lim 2002-10-27 04:20
01194 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... Amelia A Lewis 2002-10-27 04:32
01238 Re: [xml-dev] evaluating XPointers Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-27 04:33
01256 Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-27 04:47
01243 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-27 08:07
01169 Re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-27 08:18
01254 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge [email protected] 2002-10-27 08:22
01167 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... [email protected] 2002-10-27 08:24
01176 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) [email protected] 2002-10-27 08:27
01232 Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: Defining "public interfaces" in specifications] Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-27 08:31
01224 About browsers that support XSLT REC 1.0 Collin 2002-10-27 08:37
01222 Re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? [email protected] 2002-10-27 08:44
01233 Re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-27 08:46
01175 Re: [xml-dev] About browsers that support XSLT REC 1.0 [email protected] 2002-10-27 08:48
01177 Note from the Troll [email protected] 2002-10-27 11:49
01164 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric Snell 2002-10-27 12:05
01181 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Alaric Snell 2002-10-27 12:12
01168 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-27 12:24
01220 re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? David Megginson 2002-10-27 12:25
01162 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Michael Kay 2002-10-27 12:28
01235 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Michael Kay 2002-10-27 12:35
01236 dereferencing DTDs, was: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Julian Reschke 2002-10-27 12:41
01219 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Michael Kay 2002-10-27 12:46
01166 Re: [xml-dev] dereferencing DTDs, was: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Miles Sabin 2002-10-27 12:57
01178 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Alaric Snell 2002-10-27 13:05
01174 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-27 13:19
01244 Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: Defining "public interfaces" in specifications] Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-27 13:25
01251 RE: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Didier PH Martin 2002-10-27 13:52
01195 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Mike Champion 2002-10-27 14:00
01208 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Julian Reschke 2002-10-27 14:01
01198 XML cf XML Infoset [email protected] 2002-10-27 14:13
01205 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Mike Champion 2002-10-27 14:55
01252 RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: Defining "public interfaces" in specifications] Martin Soukup 2002-10-27 15:10
01242 RE: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Martin Soukup 2002-10-27 15:16
01257 Re: [xml-dev] dereferencing DTDs, was: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll J.Pietschmann 2002-10-27 15:24
01239 RE: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-27 15:32
01197 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Mike Champion 2002-10-27 15:46
01206 Re: [xml-dev] Business Logic was: Note from the Troll J.Pietschmann 2002-10-27 16:07
01253 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Amelia A Lewis 2002-10-27 16:15
01241 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Mike Champion 2002-10-27 16:27
01327 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Paul Prescod 2002-10-27 16:31
01245 RE: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-27 16:35
01286 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For?) Paul Prescod 2002-10-27 16:52
01250 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-27 16:56
01302 Re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Paul Prescod 2002-10-27 17:02
01196 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge [email protected] 2002-10-27 17:10
01207 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-27 17:14
01211 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge [email protected] 2002-10-27 17:14
01237 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-27 17:20
01193 Feedback requested- COLAG Rahul Jain 2002-10-27 17:22
01322 Re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-27 17:28
01272 Re: [xml-dev] About browsers that support XSLT REC 1.0 Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-27 17:34
01312 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Paul Prescod 2002-10-27 17:53
01359 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-27 18:05
01309 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-27 18:10
01291 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-27 18:17
01358 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-27 18:24
01348 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-27 18:32
01179 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-27 18:33
01285 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-27 18:35
01270 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Rex Brooks 2002-10-27 18:42
01316 RE: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Danny Ayers 2002-10-27 18:50
01349 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-27 19:00
01163 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are S... [email protected] 2002-10-27 19:02
01165 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Jeff Lowery 2002-10-27 19:37
01221 RE: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... Jeff Lowery 2002-10-27 19:45
01326 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge [email protected] 2002-10-27 19:47
01329 Deja vu - all over again! [email protected] 2002-10-27 19:50
01234 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... [email protected] 2002-10-27 19:52
01231 RE: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc... Jeff Lowery 2002-10-27 20:31
01218 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Kian-Tat Lim 2002-10-27 21:41
01294 RE: [xml-dev] [ANN] "Future of Software and Databases" NetSeminar (December 3) Mike Champion 2002-10-27 22:08
01303 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-28 00:00
01301 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Martin Soukup 2002-10-28 02:50
01287 Re: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Steve Muench 2002-10-28 02:57
01289 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Martin Soukup 2002-10-28 03:40
01328 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Julian Reschke 2002-10-28 07:53
01271 What is "semantic markup"? [email protected] 2002-10-28 08:05
01360 XML Data Island needs interaction with the server? Collin 2002-10-28 08:49
01300 The XML 500 word Challenge Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-28 09:04
01314 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-28 09:32
01223 Announce: XML BeLux Conference 2002 Paul Hermans 2002-10-28 10:16
01330 Re: [xml-dev] XPath and XMLFilter Robin Berjon 2002-10-28 11:33
01180 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Robin Berjon 2002-10-28 12:51
01284 OASIS TC Call For Participation: User Interface Markup Language Karl Best 2002-10-28 13:38
01304 Re: [xml-dev] What is "semantic markup"? [email protected] 2002-10-28 14:13
01347 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer [email protected] 2002-10-28 14:22
01346 RE: [xml-dev] XForms and XDocs (Was: MS office XML) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-28 14:28
01361 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Schemas For?) Mike Champion 2002-10-28 14:29
01299 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-28 14:42
01290 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-28 14:44
01288 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are S... Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-28 14:50
01317 RE: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge bryan 2002-10-28 14:56
01325 Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are S... Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-28 14:59
01283 RE: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-28 15:04
01315 Java XML View first public release Gal Binyamini 2002-10-28 15:06
01273 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer John Cowan 2002-10-28 15:07
01282 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-28 15:13
01313 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-28 15:19
01355 RE: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Brussel) 2002-10-28 15:19
01338 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Tim Bray 2002-10-28 15:28
00004 Re: [xml-dev] URIs harmful Jonathan Borden 2002-10-28 15:29
01340 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer [email protected] 2002-10-28 15:36
01292 RE: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge bryan 2002-10-28 15:38
01310 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-28 15:57
01343 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-28 16:12
00007 URIs and Names on the Web Jonathan Borden 2002-10-28 16:36
01356 [ANN] XMLNewbies Mailing List [email protected] 2002-10-28 16:58
01354 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-28 17:22
01267 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 Richard Tobin 2002-10-28 17:38
01277 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Tim Bray 2002-10-28 17:41
01276 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-28 17:56
01332 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Michael Kay 2002-10-28 18:18
01324 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-28 18:24
01269 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-28 18:32
01333 RE: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Michael Kay 2002-10-28 18:32
01275 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) [email protected] 2002-10-28 18:35
01264 Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!) Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-28 18:45
01281 Namespaces - a couple nits and questions Danny Vint 2002-10-28 18:46
01320 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer John Cowan 2002-10-28 18:49
01262 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Keith W. Boone 2002-10-28 18:49
01335 RE: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-28 18:51
01336 RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces - a couple nits and questions Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-28 19:16
01319 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 Richard Tobin 2002-10-28 19:28
01266 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll [email protected] 2002-10-28 19:38
01278 RE: [xml-dev] The XML 500 word Challenge Jeff Lowery 2002-10-28 19:42
01268 Re: [xml-dev] What is "semantic markup"? Joe English 2002-10-28 20:02
01274 Advanced text searching vs XML??? (was Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll) Mike Champion 2002-10-28 20:07
01344 Re: [xml-dev] Advanced text searching vs XML??? (was Re: [xml-dev] Note from ... [email protected] 2002-10-28 20:14
01308 Re: [xml-dev] XInclude: security risk 1 [email protected] 2002-10-28 20:14
01351 Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) [email protected] 2002-10-28 20:16
01295 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Adam Turoff 2002-10-28 20:20
01298 RE: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-28 20:21
01305 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) [email protected] 2002-10-28 20:24
01296 Re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Paul Prescod 2002-10-28 20:24
01352 RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces - a couple nits and questions Chris Wilper 2002-10-28 20:32
01342 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) [email protected] 2002-10-28 20:33
01357 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll J.Pietschmann 2002-10-28 20:47
01339 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) G. Ken Holman 2002-10-28 20:50
01297 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Adam Turoff 2002-10-28 20:53
01306 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) [email protected] 2002-10-28 20:58
01353 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) [email protected] 2002-10-28 21:00
01341 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) J.Pietschmann 2002-10-28 21:03
01345 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Adam Turoff 2002-10-28 21:08
01350 RE: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-10-28 21:17
01307 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) J.Pietschmann 2002-10-28 21:19
01337 RE: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Chuck White 2002-10-28 21:37
01311 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) [email protected] 2002-10-28 21:41
01293 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric Snell 2002-10-28 21:45
01318 RE: [xml-dev] Advanced text searching vs XML??? (was Re: [xml-dev] Note from ... Michael Kay 2002-10-28 21:49
01265 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Alaric Snell 2002-10-28 22:11
01279 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? John Cowan 2002-10-28 22:16
01280 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Alaric Snell 2002-10-28 22:46
01263 Re: [xml-dev] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs? Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-28 22:50
01321 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric Snell 2002-10-28 22:56
01334 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-28 23:09
01323 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric Snell 2002-10-28 23:29
01331 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-28 23:40
01414 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Uche Ogbuji 2002-10-29 00:55
00005 Re: [xml-dev] URIs and Names on the Web Jonathan Borden 2002-10-29 01:00
00003 Re: [xml-dev] URIs and Names on the Web Jonathan Borden 2002-10-29 01:10
01428 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-29 01:35
01385 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces - a couple nits and questions Thomas B. Passin 2002-10-29 02:35
01370 Not quite an I-D announcement Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-29 03:22
01371 Specs are not insane, people are Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-29 05:23
01384 Need Help: Creating XML Tag with ":" Satish Lohar 2002-10-29 06:38
01429 Re: [xml-dev] Need Help: Creating XML Tag with ":" Matt Gushee 2002-10-29 07:17
01412 Re: [xml-dev] Need Help: Creating XML Tag with ":" [email protected] 2002-10-29 07:36
01427 Re: [xml-dev] Need Help: Creating XML Tag with ":" Matt Gushee 2002-10-29 07:58
01416 namespace copyright, trademark patent question bryan 2002-10-29 09:13
01401 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) David Carlisle 2002-10-29 10:10
01389 RE: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Bill de hÓra 2002-10-29 10:58
01449 RE: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) bryan 2002-10-29 11:13
01458 Re: [xml-dev] Not quite an I-D announcement Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-10-29 11:55
01448 Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? David Byrden 2002-10-29 12:16
01391 Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? David Byrden 2002-10-29 12:34
01459 Re: [xml-dev] namespace copyright, trademark patent question Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III 2002-10-29 12:35
01400 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-29 12:55
01404 Re: RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-29 12:59
01402 Re: RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-29 12:59
01387 RE: Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Arnaud Blandin 2002-10-29 13:02
01386 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) David Carlisle 2002-10-29 13:04
01399 RE: RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Danny Ayers 2002-10-29 13:13
01447 RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer Martin Soukup 2002-10-29 13:18
01460 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-29 13:18
01372 RE: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Danny Ayers 2002-10-29 13:18
01461 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-29 13:21
01390 OASIS TC Call for Participation: LegalXML Online Dispute Resolution Karl Best 2002-10-29 13:25
01417 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) David Carlisle 2002-10-29 13:27
00000 Re: [xml-dev] URIs and Names on the Web Jonathan Borden 2002-10-29 13:27
01446 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) m batsis 2002-10-29 13:28
01383 Re: RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-29 13:29
01382 RE: [xml-dev] namespace copyright, trademark patent question bryan 2002-10-29 13:30
01373 XML Object Serialization David Megginson 2002-10-29 13:32
01415 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-29 13:33
00002 Re: [xml-dev] URIs and Names on the Web Jonathan Borden 2002-10-29 13:34
01426 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Robin Berjon 2002-10-29 13:35
01403 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) David Rosenborg 2002-10-29 13:37
01388 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) David Rosenborg 2002-10-29 13:37
01413 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-29 13:38
01425 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) David Rosenborg 2002-10-29 13:41
01430 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Jeni Tennison 2002-10-29 13:43
00006 Re: [xml-dev] URIs and Names on the Web Jonathan Borden 2002-10-29 13:43
01455 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-29 13:50
00001 Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs and Names on the Web) Jonathan Borden 2002-10-29 14:08
01440 RE: [xml-dev] Not quite an I-D announcement Keith W. Boone 2002-10-29 15:16
01409 Converting a DOM tree in memory in a file Jose Rodriguez 2002-10-29 15:16
01392 RE: [xml-dev] Not quite an I-D announcement Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-29 16:06
01410 Re: [xml-dev] Not quite an I-D announcement Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-29 16:14
01454 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-29 16:16
01367 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-29 16:20
01394 help with inline svg explorer bryan 2002-10-29 16:31
01376 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Paul Prescod 2002-10-29 16:33
01438 Re: [xml-dev] help with inline svg explorer Robin Berjon 2002-10-29 16:51
01456 RE: [xml-dev] Not quite an I-D announcement Keith W. Boone 2002-10-29 16:58
01443 RE: [xml-dev] Not quite an I-D announcement Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-29 17:11
01432 Re: [xml-dev] Feedback requested- COLAG Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-29 17:37
01424 RE: [xml-dev] Need Help: Creating XML Tag with ":" Dare Obasanjo 2002-10-29 17:53
01422 Re: [xml-dev] help with inline svg explorer [email protected] 2002-10-29 18:01
01433 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-29 18:06
01375 RE: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Jeff Lowery 2002-10-29 18:25
01369 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Jeff Lowery 2002-10-29 18:32
01377 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-29 18:43
01364 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-29 18:54
01381 RE: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Phil Fuhlman 2002-10-29 18:58
01362 Re: [xml-dev] Specs are not insane, people are Eric Bohlman 2002-10-29 19:02
01436 RE: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Jeff Lowery 2002-10-29 19:06
01420 OT: Visual Thesaurus - cool! Roger L. Costello 2002-10-29 19:08
01435 RE: [xml-dev] Converting a DOM tree in memory in a file Michael Kay 2002-10-29 19:27
01419 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll) Steve Ball 2002-10-29 19:48
01366 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-29 20:06
01378 Re: [xml-dev] Documenting XSLT Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-29 20:09
01374 another XPointer scheme non-announcement Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-29 21:13
01368 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Kal Ahmed 2002-10-29 21:16
01444 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization [email protected] 2002-10-30 00:31
01451 Roy Fielding on XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-30 00:31
01408 RE: [xml-dev] Converting a DOM tree in memory in a file Martin Soukup 2002-10-30 00:54
01405 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Paul Prescod 2002-10-30 01:17
01395 Re: [xml-dev] Roy Fielding on XPointer Jeff Greif 2002-10-30 01:39
01398 Re: [xml-dev] Roy Fielding on XPointer Simon St.Laurent 2002-10-30 01:53
01452 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Julian Reschke 2002-10-30 07:11
01442 RE: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Julian Reschke 2002-10-30 07:12
01457 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? [email protected] 2002-10-30 08:49
01439 Seen on BugTraq: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack Miles Sabin 2002-10-30 09:05
01397 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Robin Berjon 2002-10-30 09:51
01406 Re: [xml-dev] Note from the Troll Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-30 09:55
01453 Re: [xml-dev] Seen on BugTraq: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-30 10:03
01441 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-30 10:11
01445 Re: [xml-dev] Seen on BugTraq: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack Miles Sabin 2002-10-30 10:17
01450 Re: [xml-dev] Seen on BugTraq: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack Miles Sabin 2002-10-30 10:20
01407 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-30 10:22
01396 Re: [xml-dev] XML Object Serialization Anthony B. Coates 2002-10-30 10:26
01411 Internationalising Regular Expressions [email protected] 2002-10-30 10:30
01393 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-30 10:34
01437 Re: [xml-dev] What is XML For? Alaric B. Snell 2002-10-30 10:37
01418 Re: [xml-dev] What is "semantic markup"? Daniel Dui 2002-10-30 10:56
01365 Re: [xml-dev] What is "semantic markup"? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-30 10:59
01379 Re: [xml-dev] What is "semantic markup"? [email protected] 2002-10-30 11:12
01380 Re: [xml-dev] What is "semantic markup"? Eric van der Vlist 2002-10-30 11:21
01363 RE: [xml-dev] What is "semantic markup"? Mark Seaborne 2002-10-30 11:33
01421 Re: [xml-dev] Seen on BugTraq: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-30 11:36
01434 Re: [xml-dev] Seen on BugTraq: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack Miles Sabin 2002-10-30 11:47
01423 Re: [xml-dev] Relative URLs using the file scheme? Rick Jelliffe 2002-10-30 11:56
01431 Re: [xml-dev] Internationalising Regular Expressions John Cowan 2002-10-30 11:58