Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

 wrote:

> That tends to support my viewpoint that it is not axiomatic that further
> development of XHTML is a wise use of limited W3C resources.

What resources in particular are you concerned about? If the editors of 
XHTML 2.0 were not working on XHTML 2.0, they might spend their time at 
the pub or in the hot-tub. That wouldn't advance the Web.

  Paul Prescod