RE: [xml-dev] The non-future of XHTML x.x [LONG]

From
Michael Kay <>
To
"'Simon St.Laurent'" <>,
Date
2002-11-22T19:02:33
ID
<000b01c29259$b6dc9810$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] The non-future of XHTML x.x [LONG]
> 
> Netscape definitely did sell Navigator in boxes you could get 
> at CompUSA, but there was always a way around, usually 
> through evaluation copies.  I think most of the people who 
> actually paid for it were probably looking to get on the 
> Internet, period.
> 
I remember a time when their licensing terms were such that many
corporates preferred to pay a modest fee rather than risk being sued for
using free copies in ways that contravened the license conditions.

Michael Kay