(Rich Salz) writes:
>Me? I'm not trying to throw out anything. I'm trying to understand
>what the throwers (e.g., Michael Kay) prefer. I agree that a QNAME
>datatype is a mistake, because it's useless without context.
Cool. Could you explain this piece a bit more? I'm not sure what you
were suggesting:
> Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type
> attributes that have URI(s) describing the element?
-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
